John Locke and Morteza Motahhari on Natural Rights

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

karami hamzeh; Ahmadi Aframjani Aliakbar

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Philosophy and Kalam Year:2020 | Volume:53 | Issue:1 Page(s): 7-31

Download Full-Text

View:

315

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

John Locke and Morteza Motahhari on Natural Rights

Author(s)

karami hamzeh | Ahmadi Aframjani Aliakbar | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

natural rights

Freedom

Justice

Private Ownership

human rights

John Locke

Mortaza Motahhari

Abstract

The issue of natural rights is one of the old subject matters discussed by theologians and philosophers. My question in this essay is what John Locke and Morteza Motahhari’ s views on the meaning and role of natural rights, especially, what their views on four central aspects of natural rights, namely Freedom, Justice, ownership, and human rights, are, and in what respects their views are resemble and in what others are different. The present study addresses critically the foundations of these two thinkers on natural right and consider whether or not these foundations are rooted in theology or anthropology or both? Then, shedding light on resemblances and differences between the two thinkers, who belong to different philosophical traditions, we assess the effects and consequences of their perspective towards natural rights concerning human society. Ultimately, we show that Motahhari and Locke’ s perspectives towards human rights based on their distinct philosophical traditions introduce different horizons to human development and progress.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

karami, hamzeh, & Ahmadi Aframjani, Aliakbar. (2020). John Locke and Morteza Motahhari on Natural Rights. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 53(1 ), 7-31. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/685750/en

Vancouver: Copy

karami hamzeh, Ahmadi Aframjani Aliakbar. John Locke and Morteza Motahhari on Natural Rights. FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2020;53(1 ):7-31. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/685750/en

IEEE: Copy

hamzeh karami, and Aliakbar Ahmadi Aframjani, “John Locke and Morteza Motahhari on Natural Rights,” FALSAFE VA KALAM-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY & KALAM) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 53, no. 1 , pp. 7–31, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/685750/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops