THE CONTRADICTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN ANNULLING THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENTAL RULES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINZADEH JAVAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: MODARRES HUMAN SCIENCES Year:2008 | Volume:11 | Issue:4 (TOME 54) Page(s): 83-103

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,183

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CONTRADICTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN ANNULLING THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENTAL RULES

Author(s)

HOSSEINZADEH JAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGSQ3

CONTRADICTION PRINCIPLEQ3

ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE TRIBUNAL'S GENERAL COUNCILQ3

NULLIFICATION OF REGULATIONS CONTRARY TO THE LAWQ3

Abstract

The necessity of proceeding based on the contradiction and attempt to bring about a context in which the partners could contradict about such affairs as the crime, reasons or defending before themselves in an equal condition, is one of the most fundamental principles at the righteously trial process. This principle has been pointed out entitled "Fair Trial" in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and European Convention on Human Rights. Despite the fact that this principle has not been cited in Iranian statutes explicitly, because of its rational root, it has always been observed by the legislators and the jurisprudence in enactment and execution of the procedural rules, totally.Nevertheless, observance of the mentioned principle in some special trials such as the proceedings of ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE TRIBUNAL'S GENERAL COUNCIL in annulling the illegal governmental regulations has been hesitated because of the silence of the Law; in such away that some orders have been partly issued by the mentioned Council, without the observance of this principle.In this paper, we attempted to explain the concept and background contradiction: Moreover, the evidences of this principle and its justification in the proceedings of the ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE TRIBUNAL'S GENERAL COUNCILs were also discussed.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HOSSEINZADEH, JAVAD. (2008). THE CONTRADICTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN ANNULLING THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENTAL RULES. MODARRES HUMAN SCIENCES, 11(4 (TOME 54)), 83-103. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/6874/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOSSEINZADEH JAVAD. THE CONTRADICTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN ANNULLING THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENTAL RULES. MODARRES HUMAN SCIENCES[Internet]. 2008;11(4 (TOME 54)):83-103. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/6874/en

IEEE: Copy

JAVAD HOSSEINZADEH, “THE CONTRADICTIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN ANNULLING THE ILLEGAL GOVERNMENTAL RULES,” MODARRES HUMAN SCIENCES, vol. 11, no. 4 (TOME 54), pp. 83–103, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/6874/en

Related Journal Papers