Conditional-Predicative Conjunctive Syllogisms and Division of Propositions into Actuality, Mental and Factual

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DARABI ALIREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS Year:2021 | Volume:16 | Issue:38 Page(s): 57-76

Download Full-Text

View:

113

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Conditional-Predicative Conjunctive Syllogisms and Division of Propositions into Actuality, Mental and Factual

Author(s)

DARABI ALIREZA

Keywords

conditional-predicative conjunctive syllogism

factual propositions

actuality propositions

Abstract

The necessity of the compatibility in all elements of logic is something that has never been denied among Muslims intellectuals. Throughout the history of logic, any possible inconsistency in the rules of logic, albeit small, has led to a careful study by Muslim logicians. In the continuation of this process, the present text introduces an important inconsistency in the current views of the logicians. In contemporary opinion, the division of predicative proposition into three categories: actuality, mental, and factual (with differences in interpretation) has been endorsed by most Islamic logicians and philosophers. It is claimed that this division is independent of the rest of the rules of logic and can be accepted without changing the syllogism expressed in the logical tradition. In this paper, it is presented that elements of the conditional-predicative conjunctive syllogisms can only be accepted if the predicative propositions are factual. This claim is proved by examining the conditional-predicative conjunctive syllogism by sharing an incomplete part and the middle term is a part of conditional consequence. This part of the syllogism in the tradition of Avicennian logic is considered the most obvious example of conditional-predicative syllogism with a shared incomplete part. Careful examination of the evidence in the books of the Avicennian logicians has shown the validity of our claim.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DARABI, ALIREZA. (2021). Conditional-Predicative Conjunctive Syllogisms and Division of Propositions into Actuality, Mental and Factual. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, 16(38 ), 57-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/700895/en

Vancouver: Copy

DARABI ALIREZA. Conditional-Predicative Conjunctive Syllogisms and Division of Propositions into Actuality, Mental and Factual. PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS[Internet]. 2021;16(38 ):57-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/700895/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIREZA DARABI, “Conditional-Predicative Conjunctive Syllogisms and Division of Propositions into Actuality, Mental and Factual,” PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATIONS, vol. 16, no. 38 , pp. 57–76, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/700895/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops