Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

243
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

76
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Geopolitical Impact of the Stillborn Deal of the Century

Pages

  197-206

Abstract

 Deal of the Century is a 1983 Hollywood comedy about crooked arms dealers conspiring to peddle new weapons that “ allow for localized and conventional wars that will keep (the global arms industry’ s) business viable into the next century” (Wikipedia, June 1, 2019). Thirty-five years later, a non-fictional crooked businessman, Jared Kushner, has borrowed the title for his so-called Middle East peace plan. Is this some kind of sick joke? A bad Hollywood remake? Have Kushner and his accomplices Jason Greenblatt and David Friedman chosen this title for their so-called peace plan as a snarky acknowledgment that its real purpose is to keep the Zionist war on the Muslim East viable into the next century? Kushner’ s alleged peace plan was obviously set up to fail. It does not offer the bare minimum acceptable to Palestinians: A genuinely sovereign Palestine including all territories stolen by Israel in 1967, with its capital al-Quds, alongside an Israeli acknowledgment of the internationally-recognized Palestinian right of return and a plan— however gradual — for its implementation. Anything less is a non-starter. Kushner’ s plan does not just offer a little less than the above, nor even a lot less. It is a joke. According to Arab officials briefed on the plan, the Zionists would keep and expand their settlements on territories stolen in 1967. They would take all of al-Quds, leaving a few Palestinian neighborhoods on the outskirts. There would be no sovereign Palestinian state. Instead, the Palestinians would be herded into a slightly-expanded Gaza open-air concentration camp including a small portion of the adjacent Egyptian desert that would remain under Egyptian, not Palestinian, control. The resulting constellation of Bantustans would be labeled “ New Palestine, ” and its residents would have no sovereignty. Instead, they would actually pay their Israeli prison wardens for “ protection. ” The “ deal” amounts to the liquidation of Palestine and the completed genocide of the Palestinian people. Clearly Kushner’ s radical Zionist advisors, Jason Greenblatt and David Friedman, know that their plan is not only unviable, but an insult to every Palestinian. The only thing it offers is money— as if the Palestinians, who have fought and sacrificed bravely for their cause for more than a century (losing tens of thousands of martyrs in the process) are willing to prostitute themselves in return for something even worse than humiliating surrender. Clearly this grossly insulting proposal was designed to be rejected. Its real purpose is to unleash a new round of war justified by the public relations slogan: “ We offered the Palestinians a very good deal, so good we called it ‘ the Deal of the Century, ’ but those ungrateful Palestinians wouldn’ t accept it. ” This is precisely what the Zionists have done in the past, notably after the 2000 Camp David Summit, during which they intentionally presented non-viable proposals in order to obtain a Palestinian rejection that would provide PR cover to go ahead with their 9/11 false flag, ruthlessly attempt to crush the Palestinian resistance, and trick the USA into invading and destabilizing regional nations that the Zionists consider enemies. All of this was in line with the Zionist strategy laid out in the 1996 Netanyahu-commissioned Clean Break document (www. irmep. org) authored by neocons led by 9/11 suspect Richard Perle — roughly the same group that authored the September 2001 blueprint for 9/11 “ Rebuilding America’ s Defenses” that openly called for the coming “ New Pearl Harbor” (David Ray Griffin, 2004). Since the Kushner-Greenblatt-Friedman “ peace plan” is really a war plan, any geopolitical analysis of its ramifications must analyze the conflict(s) that will accelerate once the plan is officially rolled out and rejected. Those conflicts will presumably be continuations of the ongoing, long-standing conflicts in the region....

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Barret, Kevin. (2019). Geopolitical Impact of the Stillborn Deal of the Century. QURTERLY JOURNAL OF PALESTINE STRATEGIC DISCOURSE, 1(2 ), 197-206. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/756788/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Barret Kevin. Geopolitical Impact of the Stillborn Deal of the Century. QURTERLY JOURNAL OF PALESTINE STRATEGIC DISCOURSE[Internet]. 2019;1(2 ):197-206. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/756788/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Kevin Barret, “Geopolitical Impact of the Stillborn Deal of the Century,” QURTERLY JOURNAL OF PALESTINE STRATEGIC DISCOURSE, vol. 1, no. 2 , pp. 197–206, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/756788/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top