A Critical Study of Amritsari and Chakaralvi`s Opinions for the Quranic Sufficiency against Tradition

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

rezaei Hatfador Hasan; NASIRIAN SAFAR

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI Year:2020 | Volume:16 | Issue:60 Page(s): 42-56

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critical Study of Amritsari and Chakaralvi`s Opinions for the Quranic Sufficiency against Tradition

Author(s)

rezaei Hatfador Hasan | NASIRIAN SAFAR | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Qur’anic Sufficiency

Being against Tradition

Amritsari

Chakraralvi

Indian Subcontinent

Abstract

Although the Prophet (S) had prophesied and rejected the Quranic sufficiency from tradition before it was institutionalized by his successors of rule, with the hadith of Erika, in the last century, after many ups and downs, it was developed by two influential thinkers of the Indian Subcontinent, Abdullah Chakaralvi and Khwajeh Ahmad Amritsari. Therefore, the present study has intended to evaluate the Quranic views of these two meta-continental thinkers in a descriptive-critical manner. In this regard, the findings of the study are as follows: The three arguments presented by these two thinkers in justifying their view are as follows: The Qur’ an is a divine revelation, contrary to the tradition; the Prophet‘ s part lies in communicating the Divine revelation only not in communicating the tradition. All religious rules ma be understood by the holy Quran and there is no need to the tradition.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

rezaei Hatfador, Hasan, & NASIRIAN, SAFAR. (2020). A Critical Study of Amritsari and Chakaralvi`s Opinions for the Quranic Sufficiency against Tradition. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, 16(60 ), 42-56. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/777057/en

Vancouver: Copy

rezaei Hatfador Hasan, NASIRIAN SAFAR. A Critical Study of Amritsari and Chakaralvi`s Opinions for the Quranic Sufficiency against Tradition. ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI[Internet]. 2020;16(60 ):42-56. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/777057/en

IEEE: Copy

Hasan rezaei Hatfador, and SAFAR NASIRIAN, “A Critical Study of Amritsari and Chakaralvi`s Opinions for the Quranic Sufficiency against Tradition,” ANDISHE-E-NOVIN-E-DINI, vol. 16, no. 60 , pp. 42–56, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/777057/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops