PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHOSHOUEI M.S.; NOURI ABOU ALGHASEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advances in Cognitive Sciences Year:2009 | Volume:11 | Issue:3 (43) Page(s): 13-23

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,124

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES)

Author(s)

KHOSHOUEI M.S. | NOURI ABOU ALGHASEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

VALIDITYQ2

RELIABILITYQ2

COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES)Q3

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this research was to examine the RELIABILITY and VALIDITY of the Persian version of Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale (CTNES). Methods: To this end, 265 students from Isfahan University were selected using a random clustering procedure, and completed the Persian version of the Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale. Results: The factorial structural or construct VALIDITY of the CTNES by principal components analysis (PCA) with a Varimax rotation resulted in 4 factors which corresponded to 58.42% of the total variance. The factors included the following: 1) self-referent upward 2) non-referent downward 3) other-referent upward and 4) non-referent upward. The RELIABILITY of the Persian version of this scale as well as the four factors were calculated using Cronbach’s alpha and test-retest, and were all found to be satisfactory. Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that for measuring counterfactual thinking for negative events in Iran, the Persian version of Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale can be used as a valid and reliable test.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHOSHOUEI, M.S., & NOURI, ABOU ALGHASEM. (2009). PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES). ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 11(3 (43)), 13-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82831/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHOSHOUEI M.S., NOURI ABOU ALGHASEM. PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES). ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE[Internet]. 2009;11(3 (43)):13-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82831/en

IEEE: Copy

M.S. KHOSHOUEI, and ABOU ALGHASEM NOURI, “PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF THE COUNTERFACTUAL THINKING FOR NEGATIVE EVENTS SCALE (CTNES),” ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, vol. 11, no. 3 (43), pp. 13–23, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82831/en

Related Journal Papers