SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON AVECINNA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZAEI MOHAMMAD JAVAD

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT) Year:2005 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 141-165

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,132

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON AVECINNA"S VIEWS OF THE DIVISION OF SCIENCES

Author(s)

REZAEI MOHAMMAD JAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CLASSIFICATIONQ4

SPECULATIVE WISDOMQ2

APPLIED WISDOMQ2

NATURAL SCIENCESQ2

MATHEMATICS.Q4

Abstract

From among the subjects which have been the major concern of philosophers and men of science is the presentation of a certain kind of effective division of sciences which can be both inclusive and exclusive. One of these philosophers is Ibn Sin? (Avecinna) who presented two divisions in his works, one of which seems to be similar to that of Aristotle and the other is his own. In his first division, he divides the rational or intellectual sciences into theoretical and practical sciences, each of which is again divided into three branches and secondary or subordinate branches and comes to introduce a branch of a third kind of philosophy as logic. In his own selected division, he divides sciences in to instrumental (ali) and essential (Asali), the latter of which is divided into theoretical and practical which are again divided into four categories. Explicating the two types of philosophy, theoretical and practical, the writer deals with the problems and deficiencies each faces and raises six objections to each.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZAEI, MOHAMMAD JAVAD. (2005). SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON AVECINNA"S VIEWS OF THE DIVISION OF SCIENCES . ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT), 1(1), 141-165. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86332/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZAEI MOHAMMAD JAVAD. SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON AVECINNA"S VIEWS OF THE DIVISION OF SCIENCES . ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT)[Internet]. 2005;1(1):141-165. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/86332/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD JAVAD REZAEI, “SOME CRITICAL REMARKS ON AVECINNA"S VIEWS OF THE DIVISION OF SCIENCES ,” ETHICAL RESEARCH (RESEARCH JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR ISLAMIC THOUGHT), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141–165, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/86332/en

Related Journal Papers