A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIC ON RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES IN IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAMSHIRI B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES Year:2007 | Volume:13 | Issue:51 Page(s): 45-70

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,516

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIC ON RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES IN IRAN

Author(s)

SHAMSHIRI B. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

METHODOLOGYQ2

PSYCHOLOGY OF RELIGIONQ3

RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALESQ3

Abstract

METHODOLOGY plays the main role in performing the studies. Selecting the right method results in valid and reliable results, and an incorrect method leads to false deductions. METHODOLOGY does not form in vacuum and depends on ontological, epistemological, and anthropological views of the researcher.In this research, some methodological points in obtaining religiosity evaluation scale have been studied. These points include the theoretical foundations of research methods, the role of theory in research, the logic of selecting a research method, and designing and developing a questionnaire. The second section of the article is a critical analysis of Iranian RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES. The result of the study depicts that the most important deficits of such studies in Iran include incorrect interpretation of the results, providing wrong images of religious concepts, exerting the views of western psychological schools on Islamic concepts, and research outcome not resulting in a new theory or model.

Cites

THE ROLE OF PHILOSOPHY CONSTRUCTING AND PRODUCING OF ISLAMIC PSYCHOLOGY

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAMSHIRI, B.. (2007). A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIC ON RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES IN IRAN. METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, 13(51), 45-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/88308/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAMSHIRI B.. A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIC ON RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES IN IRAN. METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES[Internet]. 2007;13(51):45-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/88308/en

IEEE: Copy

B. SHAMSHIRI, “A METHODOLOGICAL CRITIC ON RELIGIOSITY EVALUATION SCALES IN IRAN,” METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES, vol. 13, no. 51, pp. 45–70, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/88308/en

Related Journal Papers