COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY IN THE REAL BOARDERS FOR INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF IPLF AND DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE IDEAL SITUATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHTAHMASEBI ESMAEAL; ESMAEILI GIVI MOHAMMAD REZA; SHAMSULLAHI SARA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE)) Year:2015 | Volume:21 | Issue:3 (82) Page(s): 367-388

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

653

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY IN THE REAL BOARDERS FOR INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF IPLF AND DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE IDEAL SITUATION

Author(s)

SHAHTAHMASEBI ESMAEAL | ESMAEILI GIVI MOHAMMAD REZA | SHAMSULLAHI SARA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PUBLIC LIBRARIESQ2

SENSITIVITY ANALYSISQ2

REAL BOUNDARYQ2

IDEAL STUATIONQ2

IPLFQ2

Abstract

Purpose: In this research, we analyzed and compared relative efficiency indicators of Institutional and Participatory PUBLIC LIBRARIES that being administered by Iran PUBLIC LIBRARIES Foundation (IPLF) with SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS in real boundaries.Methodology: We used descriptive- analytical methodology a long with the purpose of research. Six input and three output indexes are extracted from statistical documentations of IPLF. The statistical population was all provinces of Iran in 2010 and 2011. In addition, data envelopment analysis model has been used for calculating of performance.Findings: The results show that there are 8 and 11 efficient provinces respectfully between Participatory and Institutional Libraries. The most sensitive indicator among total indicators for both of them was number of books in input. The least sensitive indicators were the number of audiovisual for Participatory and the number of seats for Institutional Libraries in the input. The quality of the efficiency figures of Participatory Libraries of the Sistan-Balochestan province was in the best situation and efficiency figures of participatory libraries of Yazd and Hormozgan provinces were in the worst situation. Also, The quality of the efficiency figures of Institutional Libraries of the Gazvin, Khorasan-Shomali and Khorasan-Jonobi provinces were in the best situation. The mentioned quality of efficiency figures were in worst situation for Institutional Libraries of Khorasan-Razavi and Kordestan.Originality/value: This research recommends that Participatory Libraries can benchmark Institutional Libraries in output management and Institutional Libraries can benchmark Participatory Libraries in input management.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHTAHMASEBI, ESMAEAL, ESMAEILI GIVI, MOHAMMAD REZA, & SHAMSULLAHI, SARA. (2015). COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY IN THE REAL BOARDERS FOR INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF IPLF AND DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE IDEAL SITUATION. RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE)), 21(3 (82)), 367-388. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/88672/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHTAHMASEBI ESMAEAL, ESMAEILI GIVI MOHAMMAD REZA, SHAMSULLAHI SARA. COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY IN THE REAL BOARDERS FOR INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF IPLF AND DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE IDEAL SITUATION. RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE))[Internet]. 2015;21(3 (82)):367-388. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/88672/en

IEEE: Copy

ESMAEAL SHAHTAHMASEBI, MOHAMMAD REZA ESMAEILI GIVI, and SARA SHAMSULLAHI, “COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY IN THE REAL BOARDERS FOR INDEPENDENT AND COLLABORATIVE PUBLIC LIBRARIES OF IPLF AND DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF MEASURES TO ACHIEVE THE IDEAL SITUATION,” RESEARCH ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND PUBLIC LIBRARIES (PAYAM-E-KETABKHANEH (LIBRARY MESSAGE)), vol. 21, no. 3 (82), pp. 367–388, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/88672/en

Related Journal Papers