JUDGMENT BY NON-MUJTAHID IN IMAMIYA JURISPRUDENCE WITH AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI’S OPINION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAHRAMI KHOSHKAR MOHAMMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: RAHBORD Year:2013 | Volume:21 | Issue:65 Page(s): 69-92

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,936

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

JUDGMENT BY NON-MUJTAHID IN IMAMIYA JURISPRUDENCE WITH AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI’S OPINION

Author(s)

BAHRAMI KHOSHKAR MOHAMMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JUDGMENTQ3

IJTIHADQ2

APPOINTED JUDGEQ2

AUTHORIZED JUDGEQ2

FOLLOWERQ2

Abstract

Since JUDGMENT is among important topics of the Islamic jurisprudence and law, qualifications of a judge are also of high importance. IJTIHAD is one of the important conditions for becoming a judge in Islamic jurisprudence about which different viewpoints have been expressed. Most Muslim jurists, including Imam Khomeini, believe in IJTIHAD as a necessary condition for JUDGMENT. On the opposite, there is a group of mostly contemporary jurists who despite the dominant view, do not believe in the necessity of IJTIHAD as a qualification for JUDGMENT. Apparently, their evidence is stronger than the prevalent viewpoint of jurists and they can prove that IJTIHAD is unnecessary as a precondition for JUDGMENT – of course, if the informed FOLLOWER of faqih (Muslim jurist) is aware of its principles and is qualified in other respects. Presuming the necessity of IJTIHAD, JUDGMENT by an appointed FOLLOWER or proxy on behalf of mujtahid would not be authorized. However, presuming that IJTIHAD is not necessary condition for JUDGMENT, it would be authorized to appoint a FOLLOWER to do JUDGMENT. It seems that even if IJTIHAD is considered necessary as a cautionary measure and due to Islam’s strict recommendation for protecting the life, property and honor of people, in emergency cases and when a mujtahid judge is not at hand, JUDGMENT of a FOLLOWER would be authorized in order to prevent disruption in the judicial system and difficulty for people.

Cites

No record.

References

JUDGMENT OF A FOLLOWER AND A RELATIVE LEGIST (JURIST)

Cite

APA: Copy

BAHRAMI KHOSHKAR, MOHAMMAD. (2013). JUDGMENT BY NON-MUJTAHID IN IMAMIYA JURISPRUDENCE WITH AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI’S OPINION. RAHBORD, 21(65), 69-92. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89231/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAHRAMI KHOSHKAR MOHAMMAD. JUDGMENT BY NON-MUJTAHID IN IMAMIYA JURISPRUDENCE WITH AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI’S OPINION. RAHBORD[Internet]. 2013;21(65):69-92. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89231/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD BAHRAMI KHOSHKAR, “JUDGMENT BY NON-MUJTAHID IN IMAMIYA JURISPRUDENCE WITH AN APPROACH TO IMAM KHOMEINI’S OPINION,” RAHBORD, vol. 21, no. 65, pp. 69–92, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89231/en

Related Journal Papers