مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

659
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of Ibn Sina s and Mulla Sadras Philosophical Principles of Intermediary Development Based on Religious Texts

Pages

  39-54

Abstract

 In religious sources, based on the logic of revelation, the development of the soul in the intermediate world is certain and impeccable. However, the quality of intermediary development and its probable inconsistency certain philosophical principles, such as the necessity for any kind of development to be preceded by potency and motion and allocating them to matter, makes it necessary for this kind of development to be only possible based on religious (Shar‘i) principles. In other words, philosophers might not be able to demonstrate the possibility of the souls’ intermediary development on the basis of rational principles. In this paper, the writers initially examine the traditional proofs for intermediary development based on religious texts and then investigate it in the light of the fundamental principles proposed by two prominent Islamic philosophers, Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra. After a comparative study of their views, the writers conclude that intermediary development is impossible based on both philosophers’ principles regarding motion. However, they also argue that, given Mulla Sadra’s view of the Ideal immateriality of the soul and his belief in the Ideal Otherworldly body, there is a more appropriate, but not sufficient, context for the posthumous development of the body.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHMADI, AMINEH, & TAHERI, S. SADRADIN. (2018). A Comparative Study of Ibn Sina s and Mulla Sadras Philosophical Principles of Intermediary Development Based on Religious Texts. KHERADNAME-YE SADRA, 23(3 (91) ), 39-54. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/89346/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHMADI AMINEH, TAHERI S. SADRADIN. A Comparative Study of Ibn Sina s and Mulla Sadras Philosophical Principles of Intermediary Development Based on Religious Texts. KHERADNAME-YE SADRA[Internet]. 2018;23(3 (91) ):39-54. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/89346/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AMINEH AHMADI, and S. SADRADIN TAHERI, “A Comparative Study of Ibn Sina s and Mulla Sadras Philosophical Principles of Intermediary Development Based on Religious Texts,” KHERADNAME-YE SADRA, vol. 23, no. 3 (91) , pp. 39–54, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/89346/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button