Evaluation and Criticism of Graham Opi's Criterion about the Success of an Argument to Prove God’ s Exists

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAMIN FARAH; Mohammad Zamani Farideh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: QABASAT Year:2020 | Volume:24 | Issue:94 Page(s): 5-27

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

455

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation and Criticism of Graham Opi's Criterion about the Success of an Argument to Prove God’ s Exists

Author(s)

RAMIN FARAH | Mohammad Zamani Farideh | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Graham OpiQ1

Successful ArgumentQ1

Wisely ReasonQ1

Maximal RationalityQ1

Abstract

Graham Opi has been heavily criticized The proofs of God's existence. He acknowledges the rationality of traditional proofs of the existence of God, but does not consider them "successful" in proving God. His criterion for the success of an argument is all the wise men who had previously rejected the result or they were agnosticism to it, convince them to reform, modify and rebuild their ideas. This article seeks to find an answer to this question: This research seeks to find an answer to this question: Is the Opi criterion acceptable in presenting a Successful Argument? And what are the challenges to this criterion? The findings of the article show that his criterion, which based on that denies all the traditional arguments for proving God’ existence, is not only realistic but also violates itself. He seems, regardless of the difference between rational reason and Wisely Reason and defending some kind of Maximal Rationality, by providing a vague criterion, to be promoting modern atheism in the cover of skepticism.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAMIN, FARAH, & Mohammad Zamani, Farideh. (2020). Evaluation and Criticism of Graham Opi's Criterion about the Success of an Argument to Prove God’ s Exists. QABASAT, 24(94 ), 5-27. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/91798/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAMIN FARAH, Mohammad Zamani Farideh. Evaluation and Criticism of Graham Opi's Criterion about the Success of an Argument to Prove God’ s Exists. QABASAT[Internet]. 2020;24(94 ):5-27. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/91798/en

IEEE: Copy

FARAH RAMIN, and Farideh Mohammad Zamani, “Evaluation and Criticism of Graham Opi's Criterion about the Success of an Argument to Prove God’ s Exists,” QABASAT, vol. 24, no. 94 , pp. 5–27, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/91798/en

Related Journal Papers