ASSESSMENT OF PENAL PROOF IN IRANIAN AND FRENCH PROCEDURE SYSTEMS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

TADAYON ABAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Comparative Law Researches Year:2010 | Volume:14 | Issue:2 (67) Page(s): 55-77

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,486

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSMENT OF PENAL PROOF IN IRANIAN AND FRENCH PROCEDURE SYSTEMS

Author(s)

TADAYON ABAS | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

JUDGE CONSCIENTIOUS CONVINCINGQ3

MORAL EVIDENCEQ3

LEGAL EVIDENCEQ3

KNOWLEDGE OF THE JUDGEQ1

PENAL PROCEDUREQ2

Abstract

Criminal law history shows that penal evidence system has gone under drastic and frequent changes. In the ancient law and the ancient European accusative procedure system, use of ordeal evidence was normal for crime proving and this evidence had judicial validity and value and resort to it had been accepted for crime proving. Rome Empire and Middle Century European law/authorities progressively attended to LEGAL EVIDENCE and in the French revolution, the way of the JUDGE CONSCIENTIOUS CONVINCING become alternative of LEGAL EVIDENCE system that nowadays it emerges in criminal procedure code of this country too. Iranian legislator accepted the moral proof system in 1290 but combined the PENAL PROCEDURE code with the legal proof system.

Cites

THE PHASE OF DECISION FOR SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE PROVING IN IRAN AND AMERICA'S PRETRIAL INVESTIGATION

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

TADAYON, ABAS. (2010). ASSESSMENT OF PENAL PROOF IN IRANIAN AND FRENCH PROCEDURE SYSTEMS. COMPARATIVE LAW RESEARCHES (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), 14(2 (67)), 55-77. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/94165/en

Vancouver: Copy

TADAYON ABAS. ASSESSMENT OF PENAL PROOF IN IRANIAN AND FRENCH PROCEDURE SYSTEMS. COMPARATIVE LAW RESEARCHES (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2010;14(2 (67)):55-77. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/94165/en

IEEE: Copy

ABAS TADAYON, “ASSESSMENT OF PENAL PROOF IN IRANIAN AND FRENCH PROCEDURE SYSTEMS,” COMPARATIVE LAW RESEARCHES (MODARES HUMAN SCIENCES), vol. 14, no. 2 (67), pp. 55–77, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/94165/en

Related Journal Papers