The Concept of Political Judgment and Its Relation to Pluralism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Hosseini Beheshti Seyed Ali Reza; ALIPOUR MAHMOUD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Political Quarterly Year:2021 | Volume:51 | Issue:1 Page(s): 99-132

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

124

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Concept of Political Judgment and Its Relation to Pluralism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum

Author(s)

Hosseini Beheshti Seyed Ali Reza | ALIPOUR MAHMOUD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Political Judgment

Pluralism

Hannah Arendt

Martha Nussbaum

Normative Political Philosophy

Abstract

In Western political philosophy, the concept of judgment is considered as a right, which is related to civil status. In Kant's view, civil status basically means argument and competition between "people’ s judgement" and "rulers" with each other. Citizens apply some kind of desirable judgment in civil life by using this right and autonomously. At the same time, the concept of judgment had another fate: it sought to find an answer to the question of whether "our perceptions of things" should be subject to fixed patterns and pre-established standards, or should each citizen make his or her own judgment? Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum are among the philosophers who have begun a philosophical and political confrontation with the concept of judgment. Influenced by the Aristotelian concept of phronesis and its function in specific and changing circumstances, these two thinkers try to offer a pluralistic conception of Political Judgment, which seeks to establish a good and Eudaemonist life based on a political-normative reading. Using a comparative method, the authors have tried to evaluate the relationship between judgment and Pluralism in the thought of these two philosophers. In addition, they express the commonalities and differences between these two philosophers in the field of Political Judgment.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Hosseini Beheshti, Seyed Ali Reza, & ALIPOUR, MAHMOUD. (2021). The Concept of Political Judgment and Its Relation to Pluralism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 51(1 ), 99-132. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/950489/en

Vancouver: Copy

Hosseini Beheshti Seyed Ali Reza, ALIPOUR MAHMOUD. The Concept of Political Judgment and Its Relation to Pluralism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2021;51(1 ):99-132. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/950489/en

IEEE: Copy

Seyed Ali Reza Hosseini Beheshti, and MAHMOUD ALIPOUR, “The Concept of Political Judgment and Its Relation to Pluralism in the Thought of Hannah Arendt and Martha Nussbaum,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 51, no. 1 , pp. 99–132, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/950489/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops