An Analytical and Comparative Consideration of the Concept of Substance in the Philosophies of Aristotle and Mullā Ṣadrā

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Mousazadeh Isa; Abedi Jigheh Mostafa; Alipoor Ebrahim

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAQD VA NAZAR Year:2020 | Volume:25 | Issue:2 (98) Page(s): 165-181

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

315

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

An Analytical and Comparative Consideration of the Concept of Substance in the Philosophies of Aristotle and Mullā Ṣadrā

Author(s)

Mousazadeh Isa | Abedi Jigheh Mostafa | Alipoor Ebrahim | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Aristotle

Mullā Ṣadrā

substance

form

existence

Abstract

In Kant’s view, there is no proof in the proper sense of the term as far as philosophical knowledge is concerned; proof applies only to mathematical knowledge, indeed. This is because, Kant believes, mathematical proofs are intuitive and a certainty-conferring argument counts as a proof insofar as it is intuitive. We should therefore see what intuition is for Kant and what the relation is between intuitions and proofs in his philosophy. Drawing on a descriptive-analytic method, this paper seeks first to clarify what Kant means by the intuition in virtue of which a certainty-conferring argument becomes a proof, and then what relation holds between such an intuition and proofs. Is the intuition in question associated with the structure of the proof or is it just associated with preliminaries of the proof? In this paper, I argue that, first of all, the intuition Kant has in mind in his discussion of argument is pure intuition, which, he believes, is exemplified in space and time that are connecting factors of empirical intuitions in understanding—indeed, it is in these two intuitions that all demonstrative and necessary mathematical knowledge is grounded. Secondly, in Kant’s view, the only axioms and preliminaries of proofs are intuitive, which implies that the distinction between proofs and philosophical arguments does not lie in their natures or structures; it lies, instead, in the fact that the premises of a syllogistical arguments are intuitive.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Mousazadeh, Isa, Abedi Jigheh, Mostafa, & Alipoor, Ebrahim. (2020). An Analytical and Comparative Consideration of the Concept of Substance in the Philosophies of Aristotle and Mullā Ṣadrā. NAQD VA NAZAR, 25(2 (98) ), 165-181. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/950772/en

Vancouver: Copy

Mousazadeh Isa, Abedi Jigheh Mostafa, Alipoor Ebrahim. An Analytical and Comparative Consideration of the Concept of Substance in the Philosophies of Aristotle and Mullā Ṣadrā. NAQD VA NAZAR[Internet]. 2020;25(2 (98) ):165-181. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/950772/en

IEEE: Copy

Isa Mousazadeh, Mostafa Abedi Jigheh, and Ebrahim Alipoor, “An Analytical and Comparative Consideration of the Concept of Substance in the Philosophies of Aristotle and Mullā Ṣadrā,” NAQD VA NAZAR, vol. 25, no. 2 (98) , pp. 165–181, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/950772/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops