مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

172
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Standards for Proving Damages and Its Amount: A Comparative Study under Transnational Instruments and International Arbitration Awards

Pages

  75-113

Abstract

 Defining the applicable standards for proving and measurement of damages constitute one of the most significant issues under the law of damages. In principle, an aggrieved party, who claims compensation for damages based on contractual liability is responsible for showing the existence and the amount of losses suffered or to be suffered. Due to great importance of the issue, Transnational Instruments of contract law, such as UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC), Principles of European Contract Law (PECL) and Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) have set out, explicitly or implicitly, special standards such as Reasonable Certainty, Reasonably Likely to Occur and so on for proving damages; By contrast, the Iranian laws and regulations including the Civil Code do not set out such standards. The legal scholarship and jurisprudence have also failed to address the issue. Therefore, a comparative study of the issue with particular look at international instruments and Arbitral Awards could provide a reliable source of guidance. This paper analyzes the general and specific standards for proving damages and those situations that fall outside of ambit of the standards such as late payment damages. By doing so, the paper tries to open the debate in Iranian law.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHOARIAN, EBRAHIM, & Sahebjam, Sara. (2020). The Standards for Proving Damages and Its Amount: A Comparative Study under Transnational Instruments and International Arbitration Awards. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), 21(65 ), 75-113. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/956443/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHOARIAN EBRAHIM, Sahebjam Sara. The Standards for Proving Damages and Its Amount: A Comparative Study under Transnational Instruments and International Arbitration Awards. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL)[Internet]. 2020;21(65 ):75-113. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/956443/en

    IEEE: Copy

    EBRAHIM SHOARIAN, and Sara Sahebjam, “The Standards for Proving Damages and Its Amount: A Comparative Study under Transnational Instruments and International Arbitration Awards,” JOURNAL OF PUBLIC LAW (LAW RESEARCH QUARTERLY) (LAW & POLITICS RESEARCH JOURNAL), vol. 21, no. 65 , pp. 75–113, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/956443/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button