مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

97
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Study of Ibn-e Sina and Mulla Sadra on Perceptions

Pages

  61-69

Abstract

 Ontological discussions of Knowledge and perception are one of the important issues that philosophers and scientists have commented on. Among the Muslim Philosophers, Ibn-e Sina and Mulla Sadra have discussed the issue of Knowledge and perception in detail. According to these two philosophers, Knowledge by acquisition is divided into sensual, imaginative, hallucinatory and intellectual. From the viewpoint of Ibn Sina and Mulla Sadra, intellectual Knowledge is abstract, but they differ about the nature of Perceptions (sensual, imaginative, hallucinatory), that is, whether they are abstract or material in nature. Ibn-e Sina believes that Perceptions are impressive in the brain and matter, whereas, Mulla Sadra believes in the Abstraction of all Perceptions irrespectively. This article, first, provides an explanation about the definition of science and the levels of Knowledge; then, it critically looks at Ibn-e Sina's argument about the materiality of Perceptions. The article points out that the arguments of Ibn-e Sina is controversial and his view of the materiality of the Perceptions is not acceptable. The article then investigates the arguments of Mulla Sadra about the abstract nature of Perceptions.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Parsaee, Javad, & GHAFARI, HOSSEIN. (2019). Comparative Study of Ibn-e Sina and Mulla Sadra on Perceptions. SADRAI WISDOM, 7(2 (14) ), 61-69. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/966665/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Parsaee Javad, GHAFARI HOSSEIN. Comparative Study of Ibn-e Sina and Mulla Sadra on Perceptions. SADRAI WISDOM[Internet]. 2019;7(2 (14) ):61-69. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/966665/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Javad Parsaee, and HOSSEIN GHAFARI, “Comparative Study of Ibn-e Sina and Mulla Sadra on Perceptions,” SADRAI WISDOM, vol. 7, no. 2 (14) , pp. 61–69, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/966665/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button