PRINCIPALITY OR ABSTRACTEDNESS OF EXISTENCE: A DISPUTE ON THE BASIS OF ASCRIPTIONS OF EXISTENCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEDAYAT AFZA MAHMOUD; QANBARI HASAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2017 | Volume:18 | Issue:2 (70) Page(s): 61-84

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

703

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PRINCIPALITY OR ABSTRACTEDNESS OF EXISTENCE: A DISPUTE ON THE BASIS OF ASCRIPTIONS OF EXISTENCE

Author(s)

HEDAYAT AFZA MAHMOUD | QANBARI HASAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AL-FARABIQ2

PARTICULAR EXISTENCEQ2

REAL EXISTENCEQ2

IBN ARABIQ2

NOMINAL EXISTENCEQ1

CONCRETE COMPOSITIONQ2

SHAYKH AL-AHSAEIQ2

ALLAMEH SEMNANIQ1

Abstract

As we take it for granted, regardless of some taken presuppositions and with respect to bringing the “exclusive or” into play, three modes are perceivable for the philosophical question of “the principality of existence or quiddity”. Some Muslim thinkers have sorted out a theory in this regard and others have argued for their own adopted view; while the mode thinkers have taken to stride in the debate at hand shows their disagreement lied based on a priori principles. Naturally, the concept of “existence” and “quiddity” can be considered as the most fundamental conceptual origins of the debate in question. In this article, adopting the method related to history of philosophy and on the basis of ascriptions of “existence” –to which some thinkers have given meticulous thought-, some outstanding analyses and comparisons in terms of thinkers’ exchanges have been accomplished. This research findings are as follows: Firstly, the concept of “existence” should not be called the most known thing per se as it does possess various ascriptions. Secondly, as the dispute concerning the principality or abstractedness of existence is not a matter of demonstration, one cannot argue merely for one theory so to simultaneously undermine other ones. However, this question entirely relies upon the primary perception each thinker has taken for “existence”. Thirdly, since some ascriptions of “existence” imply its CONCRETE COMPOSITION with quiddity, it’s no longer intelligible to simultaneously speak of the abstractedness and principality of the two sides.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HEDAYAT AFZA, MAHMOUD, & QANBARI, HASAN. (2017). PRINCIPALITY OR ABSTRACTEDNESS OF EXISTENCE: A DISPUTE ON THE BASIS OF ASCRIPTIONS OF EXISTENCE. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 18(2 (70)), 61-84. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98147/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEDAYAT AFZA MAHMOUD, QANBARI HASAN. PRINCIPALITY OR ABSTRACTEDNESS OF EXISTENCE: A DISPUTE ON THE BASIS OF ASCRIPTIONS OF EXISTENCE. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;18(2 (70)):61-84. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98147/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHMOUD HEDAYAT AFZA, and HASAN QANBARI, “PRINCIPALITY OR ABSTRACTEDNESS OF EXISTENCE: A DISPUTE ON THE BASIS OF ASCRIPTIONS OF EXISTENCE,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 18, no. 2 (70), pp. 61–84, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98147/en

Related Journal Papers