HEIDEGGER'S CRITIQUE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOSLEH ALI ASQHAR; ETEMADINIA MOJTABA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2016 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 (68) Page(s): 7-26

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

759

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HEIDEGGER'S CRITIQUE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING

Author(s)

MOSLEH ALI ASQHAR | ETEMADINIA MOJTABA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEINGQ1

FORGETTING THE BEINGQ1

REPRESENTATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGYQ1

Abstract

Each traditional perceptions of THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING has been in some way disappeared and waned during modern period of western thought, especially after 18th century, which caused this ontological foundation of pre-modern thought to be forgotten, neglected or denied. Among the refutations and denials related to THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING, Martin Heidegger's fundamental critique of this kind of perception of being and its stages has a great difference with other critics' approach. Contrary to most critics of THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING, who principally regarded its traditional expositions as unacceptable on the basis of a topical critique, Heidegger generally regarded this kind of perception of being as incorrect and incomplete because it provided the ground for forgetting the question of meaning and reality of being. According to Heidegger, considering being as a foundation, which is one of most basic theoretical foundations of many scholastic expositions of great pyramid of being, negates confronting with reality of being as unhidden essence. In these expositions, the first origin replaces the question of meaning and reality of being in the position of a reality in which being and essence overlap. In addition, neglecting ontological distinction in philosophical expositions of great pyramid of being, theological nature of these expositions, basing most of them on the system of Aristotelian categories and REPRESENTATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY, and providing an incomplete and unauthentic profile of man in most of these expositions are among the Heidegger's most important critiques of traditional and modern perceptions of great pyramid of being.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOSLEH, ALI ASQHAR, & ETEMADINIA, MOJTABA. (2016). HEIDEGGER'S CRITIQUE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 17(4 (68)), 7-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98189/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOSLEH ALI ASQHAR, ETEMADINIA MOJTABA. HEIDEGGER'S CRITIQUE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2016;17(4 (68)):7-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98189/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI ASQHAR MOSLEH, and MOJTABA ETEMADINIA, “HEIDEGGER'S CRITIQUE OF THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE GREAT PYRAMID OF BEING,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 17, no. 4 (68), pp. 7–26, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98189/en

Related Journal Papers