SOME AMBIGUITIES IN TABATABAI’S READING OF THE PROOF OF TRUTHFUL ONES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FAGHIHIMANI F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

496

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SOME AMBIGUITIES IN TABATABAI’S READING OF THE PROOF OF TRUTHFUL ONES

Author(s)

FAGHIHIMANI F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

REALITYQ2

THE NECESSARY BEINGQ2

THE REALITY OF BEINGQ2

DEMONSTRATIVE ASPECTQ2

THE TRUTHFULNESS ASPECTQ2

TABATABAEIQ2

Abstract

The proof of truthful ones, which is taken as the most forceful argument in this regard, has different readings. Tabatabai has offered the last one.Explaining this reading, we proceed to mention some critical points. The first one is that the rejection of objective REALITY doesn’t lead to the approval of “objective REALITY”; it just invokes a REALITY which can be a conceptual being.The second point is that in the last premise of the proof which is theoretical, “all REALITY” is understood as the “the Absolute REALITY” (the Necessary Being). This issue is not only inconsistent with his claim, but also calls the proof into question. The third one is that assuming the validity of his reading in proving absolute REALITY and its being in itself, it lacks a clear explanation to prove its being for-itself. And finally, mediation of the world and the passing world (namely the observation of non-being) in his reading of the proof, while all its mediations supposed to be merely ontological, doesn’t meet with the title of the proof: truthful ones. Thus, even if we accept the validity of his reading and its ability to prove the absolute REALITY and its being in itself and for itself, it cannot be called the proof of truthful ones.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FAGHIHIMANI, F.. (2011). SOME AMBIGUITIES IN TABATABAI’S READING OF THE PROOF OF TRUTHFUL ONES. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 12(4 (48)), 147-159. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98247/en

Vancouver: Copy

FAGHIHIMANI F.. SOME AMBIGUITIES IN TABATABAI’S READING OF THE PROOF OF TRUTHFUL ONES. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2011;12(4 (48)):147-159. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98247/en

IEEE: Copy

F. FAGHIHIMANI, “SOME AMBIGUITIES IN TABATABAI’S READING OF THE PROOF OF TRUTHFUL ONES,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 12, no. 4 (48), pp. 147–159, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98247/en

Related Journal Papers