AN ACCOUNT, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO LETTERS OF BELIEFS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHIMPOOR FROOGH AL SADAT

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

880

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ACCOUNT, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO LETTERS OF BELIEFS

Author(s)

RAHIMPOOR FROOGH AL SADAT | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SHEIKH BAHA' I'Q1

MAJLESIQ2

TREATISE ON THE PRINCIPLES OF FAITHQ2

Abstract

Oral or written presentation of religious principles of faith is an old tradition among Muslims. The aim of these letters of beliefs is to preserve and transfer the basic and common principles of every sect. However, they include some of the writer or narrator's personal views and beliefs which should not be confused with those common principles. The issues and discussions presented 8 by a writer in his/her treatise show not only the basis of his religion but also his way of thinking, insight, nature and character. The present paper elaborate on, analyzes and compares SHEIKH BAHA' I' and MAJLESI's letters of beliefs. In his treatise, MAJLESI is more concerned with recommendation and prescription, and his imperative language likens his treatise to jurists' practical treatises. In contrast, SHEIKH BAHA' I' absolutely describes and explains his views and does not criticize or anathematizes the opponents. He allocates two third of his treatise to the explanation of practical issues of Islam, but MAJLESI allocates most of his treatise to the explanation of the principles of faith and considers the explanation of preliminaries of acts and moral recommendations sufficient in terms of acts.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHIMPOOR, FROOGH AL SADAT. (2013). AN ACCOUNT, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO LETTERS OF BELIEFS. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 14(3-4), 249-276. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98262/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHIMPOOR FROOGH AL SADAT. AN ACCOUNT, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO LETTERS OF BELIEFS. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2013;14(3-4):249-276. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98262/en

IEEE: Copy

FROOGH AL SADAT RAHIMPOOR, “AN ACCOUNT, COMPARISON AND ANALYSIS OF TWO LETTERS OF BELIEFS,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 14, no. 3-4, pp. 249–276, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98262/en

Related Journal Papers