AN ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF AVICENNA'S VIEW ABOUT MOTIVE AGENCY ON THE BASIS OF HIS ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YOSAFIMANASH ZOHRE; ZAMANIHA HUSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

650

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

AN ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF AVICENNA'S VIEW ABOUT MOTIVE AGENCY ON THE BASIS OF HIS ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS

Author(s)

YOSAFIMANASH ZOHRE | ZAMANIHA HUSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AVICENNAQ2

CAUSALITYQ2

CREATIVE AGENTQ1

MOTIVE AGENTQ1

MOTIONQ2

INCLINATIONQ2

Abstract

Having deprived the principle of CAUSALITY as existence-giver from the position of existing agents in natural world, AVICENNA used the construction of MOTIVE AGENT to justify their effects. However, careful reflection on how MOTION exists and its meaning implies that in AVICENNA's system of thought MOTION is a possible fact and consequent accident, so it needs an independent cause in its creation to create it. Thus, natural agent which was first supposed to be the donor of MOTION is now considered existence-giver, given the above explanation. This poses the following questions: what is the role of natural agent at the end? What does it mean when it is said that natural agent bestows MOTION? Is there any difference between creating MOTION and creating other creatures, which allows AVICENNA to attribute CAUSALITY as MOTION-creator to natural agent? The present paper discusses and analyzes AVICENNA's view in two parts of creative cause and motive cause while referring to superficial inconsistency in his words, and tries to use his "theory of INCLINATION" to remove this inconsistency.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YOSAFIMANASH, ZOHRE, & ZAMANIHA, HUSSEIN. (2017). AN ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF AVICENNA'S VIEW ABOUT MOTIVE AGENCY ON THE BASIS OF HIS ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 19(1 (71)), 197-213. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98280/en

Vancouver: Copy

YOSAFIMANASH ZOHRE, ZAMANIHA HUSSEIN. AN ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF AVICENNA'S VIEW ABOUT MOTIVE AGENCY ON THE BASIS OF HIS ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;19(1 (71)):197-213. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98280/en

IEEE: Copy

ZOHRE YOSAFIMANASH, and HUSSEIN ZAMANIHA, “AN ANALYSIS AND REVIEW OF AVICENNA'S VIEW ABOUT MOTIVE AGENCY ON THE BASIS OF HIS ONTOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 19, no. 1 (71), pp. 197–213, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98280/en

Related Journal Papers