COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF MOTAHARI'S AND ASHTIANI'S APPROACHES TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHMATI H.A.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2006 | Volume:8 | Issue:1 (29) Page(s): 135-161

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

766

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF MOTAHARI'S AND ASHTIANI'S APPROACHES TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY

Author(s)

RAHMATI H.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

WESTERN PHILOSOPHYQ3

MOTAHARIQ2

ASHTIANIQ3

IRANIANSQ3

ISLAMIC PHILOSOPHERSQ3

Abstract

Iranians have been familiar with new western philosophies for more than one century. One of the main subjects which today should be seriously dealt with is typology of Iranian thinkers' approaches to those philosophies. The author of this paper holds that Sayyed Jalal d-din ASHTIANI and Morteza MOTAHARI can be studied as representative of two different approaches to WESTERN PHILOSOPHY. According to the author's claim, MOTAHARI's approach is more plausible, more useful and more practical. Presenting some introductory points, the present article examines these two thinkers' viewpoints of WESTERN PHILOSOPHY in a comparative way; then, it explains why Mortahari's approach is better, though possessing shortcomingsa.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHMATI, H.A.. (2006). COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF MOTAHARI'S AND ASHTIANI'S APPROACHES TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 8(1 (29)), 135-161. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98367/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHMATI H.A.. COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF MOTAHARI'S AND ASHTIANI'S APPROACHES TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2006;8(1 (29)):135-161. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98367/en

IEEE: Copy

H.A. RAHMATI, “COMPARATIVE TYPOLOGY OF MOTAHARI'S AND ASHTIANI'S APPROACHES TO WESTERN PHILOSOPHY,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 1 (29), pp. 135–161, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98367/en

Related Journal Papers