COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TWO COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AKVAN M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2007 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 (30) Page(s): 169-197

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,015

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TWO COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL

Author(s)

AKVAN M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PHILOSOPHICAL COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ3

THEOLOGICAL COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTQ3

CREATIONQ2

ETERNITYQ2

Abstract

Cosmological demonstrations are among the most important arguments which are used by both the philosophers and the Mutakallimun (speculative theologians) to establish the existence of God. From the philosophers’ viewpoint, the core of such an argument is contingency and necessity, whereas from Mutakallimin’s point of view, it is ETERNITY (qidam) and CREATION (huduth).The present paper is going to clarify these two arguments and their foundations. Then it deals with the criterion of the need of an effect for a cause according to the philosophers’ and the Mutakallimin’s viewpoints. Finally, it criticizes the arguments, presenting Mulla Sadra’s opinions in this concern.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AKVAN, M.. (2007). COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TWO COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 8(2 (30)), 169-197. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98424/en

Vancouver: Copy

AKVAN M.. COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TWO COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2007;8(2 (30)):169-197. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98424/en

IEEE: Copy

M. AKVAN, “COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF TWO COSMOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 8, no. 2 (30), pp. 169–197, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98424/en

Related Journal Papers