مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

91
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

64
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Encounter (in Absence! ): The Main Principles of Dialogue among Heterogeneous Literary Theories

Pages

  181-202

Abstract

 After two decades, the challenge of theory-phobia and theory-ism has, for some, entered a discourse that can be called the ‘ critical discourse’ of comparative studies of Persian poetics. This discourse challenges comparative studies of the heterogeneous Persian and Western literatures and through the essential and foundational rejection of these studies, attempts to deny their existence and essence. Some Western scholars regard other literatures as a propelling force that can fill in the void of contemporary Literary Theory. Others from the East consider such studies to be an opportunity to regain a lost literary-theoretical identity and thus return to the global literary discourse. Even though the critical discourse intends to deny comparative theoretical studies in an imbalanced way, it, nonetheless, puts forward some points which are required for such studies to be done, and highlights the explication of a special set of instructions for dialogue among heterogeneous literary theories. Pursuing this aim, the present paper adopts a descriptive-analytical method in order to critically present and develop the main principles of Shunqing’ s Variation Theory. What he establishes as the four main principles of dialogue – discursive independence, discursive equality, mutual elucidation, and the search for a common ground while maintaining difference as well as the mutual complements of variability among heterogeneous literary theories – contain a set of practical instructions that can introduce Comparative Poetics to a new phase of dialogue.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Soltani, Behrouz, RAZI, AHMAD, & NIKOUIE, ALIREZA. (2021). Encounter (in Absence! ): The Main Principles of Dialogue among Heterogeneous Literary Theories. LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM, 5(2 (10) ), 181-202. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/985910/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Soltani Behrouz, RAZI AHMAD, NIKOUIE ALIREZA. Encounter (in Absence! ): The Main Principles of Dialogue among Heterogeneous Literary Theories. LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM[Internet]. 2021;5(2 (10) ):181-202. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/985910/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Behrouz Soltani, AHMAD RAZI, and ALIREZA NIKOUIE, “Encounter (in Absence! ): The Main Principles of Dialogue among Heterogeneous Literary Theories,” LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM, vol. 5, no. 2 (10) , pp. 181–202, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/985910/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button