ALTHOUGH ACCORDING TO DOMESTIC LAW, CITIZENSHIP IS A PREREQUISITE FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF RIGHTS BUT IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN RIGHTS WOULD MAINTAIN THAT BEING HUMAN IS THE SUFFICIENT TO HAVE HUMAN RIGHTS. BECAUSE BEING HUMAN IS THE SOLE REQUIREMENT ENTITLING ONE TO HUMAN RIGHTS, WHETHER OR NOT ONE POSSESS A NATIONALITY SHOULD HAVE NO BEARING ON WHETHER ONE ENJOYS ALL OF HER OR HIS HUMAN RIGHTS. HOWEVER, IN PRACTICE, STATELESSNESS ARE RESULTED TO HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AGAINST PERSONS WITHOUT NATIONALITY. IN THIS ARTICLE WE WILL SAY THAT THE MOST SIGNIFICANT GROUP AFFECTED BY THIS ISSUE ARE A MUSLIM MINORITY IN MYANMAR KNOWN AS THE ROHINGYA WHO ARE NOT RECOGNIZED AS ONE OF THE COUNTRY’S “NATIONAL RACES” UNDER THE 1982 CITIZENSHIP ACT. STATELESS ROHINGYA IN RAKHINE STATE HAVE FACED GRAVE HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES FOR SEVERAL DECADES, INCLUDING RESTRICTIONS ON FREE MOVEMENT, LAND CONFISCATION, EXACTION OF FORCED LABOR AND ETC. INDEED, THIS REFLECTS STATELESSNESS IMPACT IN INCREASING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.