MANY MOVING PARTS: EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIN KEEPERSM CANCER PREVENTION INTERVENTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FORD SABRINA; TALLEY COSTELLIA; MEGHEA CRISTIAN; WILLIAMS KAREN PATRICIA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH RESEARCH Year:2018 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 Page(s): 32-41

Download Full-Text

View:

575

Download:

228

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MANY MOVING PARTS: EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIN KEEPERSM CANCER PREVENTION INTERVENTION

Author(s)

FORD SABRINA | TALLEY COSTELLIA | MEGHEA CRISTIAN | WILLIAMS KAREN PATRICIA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PROGRAM EVALUATION

CANCER PREVENTION

KIN KEEPER SM

BLACK

LATINA

ARAB

WOMEN

HEALTH DISPARITIES

HEALTH COMMUNICATION

Abstract

Introduction: This evaluation of the implementation of a CANCER PREVENTION intervention includes; intervention fidelity, participant satisfaction, participant retention, and the cost of program implementation. The main purpose of this paper is to disseminate findings in order to inform and promote similar community health programming.Methods: The evaluation framework integrates several models, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Evaluation Framework and the University of Wisconsin-Extension (UW-EX) Evaluation Model. This evaluation process is complex in that it: (1) is community-based participatory research (CBPR); (2) is a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT); (3) uses an ecological approach; and (4) is multicultural.Results: For intervention fidelity, we found that 90% of participants reported high fidelity in the delivery of the intervention as well as strong participant satisfaction. Likewise, 90% of CHWs also report high fidelity in training provided and intervention integrity. Over 36 months of follow-up, the participant retention rate was 79% or more with no significant differences between the intervention and control groups. The cost to implement and deliver the program to each intervention participant was $151.Conclusion: These outcomes can inform policymakers in order to disseminate and implement quality HEALTH COMMUNICATION programming.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FORD, SABRINA, TALLEY, COSTELLIA, MEGHEA, CRISTIAN, & WILLIAMS, KAREN PATRICIA. (2018). MANY MOVING PARTS: EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIN KEEPERSM CANCER PREVENTION INTERVENTION. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH RESEARCH, 7(1), 32-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/344253/en

Vancouver: Copy

FORD SABRINA, TALLEY COSTELLIA, MEGHEA CRISTIAN, WILLIAMS KAREN PATRICIA. MANY MOVING PARTS: EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIN KEEPERSM CANCER PREVENTION INTERVENTION. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH RESEARCH[Internet]. 2018;7(1):32-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/344253/en

IEEE: Copy

SABRINA FORD, COSTELLIA TALLEY, CRISTIAN MEGHEA, and KAREN PATRICIA WILLIAMS, “MANY MOVING PARTS: EVALUATING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE KIN KEEPERSM CANCER PREVENTION INTERVENTION,” JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH RESEARCH, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/344253/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops