The present research paper aims to study the cultural and conversational appropriateness through comparing cultural conversations in popular and elitist movies. This paper is within qualitative methods of content analysis which employs conventional concepts and indices in conversational and sociological studies. The purposeful sampling is used as the research's sampling method which is the main sampling method in conversation analysis. In doing so, five elitist movies (a Time for Drunken Horses, Children of Heaven, Gilane, Offside, and Under the Moonlight) and five popular movies (Marde Avazi, Hemlock, Kolah Ghermezi and Sarvenaz, Khaharan-e Gharib, and Marmoolak) were selected and compared. Popular and elitist movies could be distinguished by studying and evaluating audiences and customers of different movies.Popular ones are those which are received by “the general public” and especially medium and lower classes. Also, they should be blockbuster movies otherwise they could not be ranked as “popular”. Therefore, the sales index is selected as the most suitable index for popular and publicly-received movies. Elitist movies are associated with high tastes and cultural classes with higher education levels. Thus, movies winning several awards in international film festivals are selected as elitist movies.These awards indicate the high artistic value of a movie which is the most important trait of an elitist movie.It is concluded that in regards to story roles in popular and elitist movies, unlike the depicted story environments, there is an obvious difference between elitist and popular movies of the research's sample. However, considering the studied time period (1996-2006), in regards to story roles, a change of attitude is observable in Iranian film industry, that is, the country's movies have gradually shifted from a closed structure to an open structure. Therefore, a relativist cultural discourse could be seen in popular and elitist movies.