Year:2023 | Volume:2 | Issue:7supplement|Papers Count:3

In the last ten years, nature and biophilic design have attracted wide attention in architecture, especially in response to growing environmental challenges, and different frameworks have been defined for it. Stephen R. Kellert", was the first researcher to define a comprehensive framework for biophilic design in the field of architecture, which can be used to build buildings with a biophilic approach,Now we are faced with the issue of whether architecture and biophilic buildings have emerged only in the last ten years or the principles that are related to biophilic buildings today existed in the architecture and buildings of the past? The research method of this article is descriptive-analytical and survey in the form of a field survey, which is defined by the definition of the emergence of bioflake architecture and the examination of its defined frameworks by Kellert, and then by studying the characteristics of Prince Mahan's garden and matching it with the defined principles, this The result is that biophilic architecture is not a newly invented phenomenon and has existed in the design principles of past buildings, and finally, biophilic can be mentioned as an element that has existed throughout history and mankind has only been able to Write biophilic in a comprehensive framework.

All its buildings and architecture more or less indicate a meaning. Each building evokes a special meaning in the viewer's mind, which is consistent with the knowledge of semiotics. Also, nature is full of symbolic and semiotic effects that can be used in the basic courses of architectural design. On the other hand, "Altschuller" considers the science under the title of "technology of creativity and innovation", which can be considered as the science of "creativity". The statistical research population of academic professors of the country's top universities and the sample size using Morgan's formula for the validity of the research was calculated to be 150 people who were randomly selected. Also, Torrance and Abedi's (2018) standard questionnaire for measuring creativity and the researcher-made questionnaire of the problem solving process through the TRIZ technique were used to collect information, and their reliability was verified through Cronbach's alpha for the meaningful connection of nature-based semiotics education in promotion. Creativity in basic courses of architecture and problem solving process through TRIZ technique was obtained as 0. 873 and 0. 905 respectively. A simple linear regression test was used to analyze the collected data and the results of the research showed that there is a significant relationship between nature-based semiotics education and enhancing students' creativity from the perspective of academic experts and problem solving process through the TRIZ technique. There is. And it was also concluded that there is a significant relationship between nature-based semiotics education and the selection of problem-solving tools (Rando sketches and mock-ups) through the TRIZ technique, and according to the calculated beta, the relationship between nature-based semiotics education and Problem solving tools (Rando sketches and mock-ups) are confirmed through the TRIZ technique. Also, at the end, solutions to improve the application of semiotic knowledge based on nature and natural patterns in improving students' creativity have been mentioned.

Referring to the history and flow of debates about the relationship between form and function in biological structures, it can be noted that in the middle of 1850, "Darwin" took the situation seriously and using the theory of "Von Humboldt", he claimed that "nature”, , has chosen the forms that have created the best compatibility and appropriateness with the environment of their establishment, which was the root of the formation of biophilic, biomimicry and biomorphic architecture. In the era after the Islamic revolution, many architects took advantage of different subjects to create innovative architectural designs that were full of innovation and creativity in architecture. In the meantime, the use of traditional subjects of Iranian architecture, while pointing to innovation in architecture after the Islamic revolution, showed a new type of use of traditional subjects in today's architecture. The research method is descriptive-analytical and Delphi method. Also, the method of logical reasoning has been used to adapt and analyze the functional and formal components of luxurious buildings with biomorphic and biomimicry architectural features. Also, the "Delphi method based on factor analysis" was used to ask 50 university professors about the archeology of each building through a specific format and table with biomorphic and biomimicry architectural features. The findings of the research show that most of the magnificent works after the revolution did not have a significant relationship with biomimicry architectural features and only a small percentage had biomorphic features. At the same time, biophilic architectural indicators have been seen in many works and none of them are considered zoomorphic architecture.