Purpose: To compare the results of standard and augmented surgical treament of patients with partial accommodative esotropia.Patients and methods: In this sequential matched randomized double blind clinical trial, 50 patients (100 eyes) with partial accomodative esotropia were studied at strabismus clinic in Farabi eye hospital, from 1999-2000. Age varied from 13 to 144 months. Patients were grouped according to age, degree of hyperopia and AC/A (accomodative convergenceaccomodation) ratio into standard and augmented subgroups (25 patients in each group). All patients were followed for at least 6 months after standard or augmented bimedial recession with or without inferior oblique weakening procedure. Post operative visual acuity, hyperopia, eye deviation, stereopsis, fusion and AC/A ratio were compared between the groups.Results: Post operative acceptable deviation was observed in 36% and 84% at first week (P<0.001), in 64% and 84% at sixth week (P<0.05) and in 88% and 92% at sixth month of follow up (NS) in patients of standard and augmented groups, respectively. Other findings in standard and augmented groups were as follows. Improvement of visual acuity (at least one line) in 8% and 20%, fusion in 8 of 13 patients (61.5%) and in 9 of 14 patients (64.3%), stereopsis in 2 of 13 patients (15.4%) and in 3 of 13 patients (23%), and reduction of AC/A ratio in all patients with high AC/A ratio, in both groups, which were not statistically significant.Conclusion: This study showed that augmented surgery improves longterm aligment, visual acuity, streopsis, and fusion greater than standard group, but statistically insignificant, which might be due to short duration of follow up and the small number of cases in each group.