COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY AND MET AMEMORY BETWEEN NORMAL AND OCD INDIVIDUALS IN NON CLINICAL POPULATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

POORDANA MOJDE; MOUSAVI SEYED ALI MOHAMMAD; AHMADI ABDOLJAVAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (JOURNAL OF IRANIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS) Year:2014 | Volume:11 | Issue:41 Page(s): 55-66

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,285

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY AND MET AMEMORY BETWEEN NORMAL AND OCD INDIVIDUALS IN NON CLINICAL POPULATION

Author(s)

POORDANA MOJDE | MOUSAVI SEYED ALI MOHAMMAD | AHMADI ABDOLJAVAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE DISORDERQ2

PROSPECTIVE MEMORYQ1

META-MEMORYQ1

FEELING OF-KNOWING JUDGMENTQ2

Abstract

this study aimed to compare PROSPECTIVE MEMORY and META-MEMORY (feeling- of- knowing judgments) of normal individuals and individuals with OCD. The participants were 100 students of Imam Khomeini International University in Tehran and Islamic Azad University Karaj Branch. To assess the severity of OCD symptoms, the Maudsley Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (Hodgson & Rachman, 1977) was used. PROSPECTIVE MEMORY, memory and metamemory performance were assessed by the Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (Crawford, Smith, Della Sala, Logie, & Maylor, 2003) and the neutral and threat related material (adapted from Tuna, Tekcan, & Topcuoglu, 2005) respectively. The result of independent t–test indicated that the normal group had better scores in PROSPECTIVE MEMORY than OCD group. The results of Manova indicated that META-MEMORY performance is better in normal group in comparison to OCD group but there wasn’t any difference between two groups in memory performance.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

POORDANA, MOJDE, MOUSAVI, SEYED ALI MOHAMMAD, & AHMADI, ABDOLJAVAD. (2014). COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY AND MET AMEMORY BETWEEN NORMAL AND OCD INDIVIDUALS IN NON CLINICAL POPULATION. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (JOURNAL OF IRANIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS), 11(41), 55-66. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/101536/en

Vancouver: Copy

POORDANA MOJDE, MOUSAVI SEYED ALI MOHAMMAD, AHMADI ABDOLJAVAD. COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY AND MET AMEMORY BETWEEN NORMAL AND OCD INDIVIDUALS IN NON CLINICAL POPULATION. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (JOURNAL OF IRANIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS)[Internet]. 2014;11(41):55-66. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/101536/en

IEEE: Copy

MOJDE POORDANA, SEYED ALI MOHAMMAD MOUSAVI, and ABDOLJAVAD AHMADI, “COMPARISON OF PROSPECTIVE MEMORY AND MET AMEMORY BETWEEN NORMAL AND OCD INDIVIDUALS IN NON CLINICAL POPULATION,” DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (JOURNAL OF IRANIAN PSYCHOLOGISTS), vol. 11, no. 41, pp. 55–66, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/101536/en

Related Journal Papers