A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LITERARY APPROACHES OF SANAEI AND NIZAMI ABOUT POETRY, POET AND READER

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NABILOU CHEHRAGHANI A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature Year:2007 | Volume:8 | Issue:14 Page(s): 43-76

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,937

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LITERARY APPROACHES OF SANAEI AND NIZAMI ABOUT POETRY, POET AND READER

Author(s)

NABILOU CHEHRAGHANI A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LITERARY APPROACHQ3

CRITICISMQ2

POEMQ2

POETQ3

SANAEIQ2

NIZAMIQ2

Abstract

Sanaei and NIZAMI have particular LITERARY APPROACHes and CRITICISMs of POETry. These approaches and CRITICISMs have a large implication from the point of view of speech and POEM, POET and reader. NIZAMI has been influenced by SANAEI especially in Makhzan-al-Asrar, and his thought is the same as SANAEI. NIZAMI has reviewed his thoughts after Makhzan –al-Asrar, but his approach remains unchanged in speech and POETry.Attention has been paid to the pivotal communications in both POETs’ works which are still utilized in contemporary POETry. Thus, the present article attempts to select and analyze their approaches to the message (speech and POEM), the speaker (poet) and the reader (hearer), because the main branch of their thoughts center on such things. Both of tem have pointed out specific traits for these three aspects which come closed to each other. To support my argument, I illustrate some charts to show their comparisons.

Cites

THE SIX FUNCTIONS OF LANGUAGE THE DIDACTIC LITERATURE RELYING ON THE ONE OF THE ODES OF SANAEE

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NABILOU CHEHRAGHANI, A.R.. (2007). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LITERARY APPROACHES OF SANAEI AND NIZAMI ABOUT POETRY, POET AND READER. KAVOSHNAMEH, 8(14), 43-76. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/101606/en

Vancouver: Copy

NABILOU CHEHRAGHANI A.R.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LITERARY APPROACHES OF SANAEI AND NIZAMI ABOUT POETRY, POET AND READER. KAVOSHNAMEH[Internet]. 2007;8(14):43-76. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/101606/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. NABILOU CHEHRAGHANI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF LITERARY APPROACHES OF SANAEI AND NIZAMI ABOUT POETRY, POET AND READER,” KAVOSHNAMEH, vol. 8, no. 14, pp. 43–76, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/101606/en

Related Journal Papers