Identification and Ranking the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management Implementation Using Metasynthesis Method

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RONAGHI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; Zeinodinzadeh Sara; Alambeladi Sepehr

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE Year:2019 | Volume:22 | Issue:3 (87) Page(s): 112-135

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

909

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Identification and Ranking the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management Implementation Using Metasynthesis Method

Author(s)

RONAGHI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN | Zeinodinzadeh Sara | Alambeladi Sepehr | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Knowledge managementQ2

Knowledge management implementationQ2

Meta-synthesisQ1

Shannon EntropyQ2

Abstract

Objective: Organizations require Knowledge management (KM) in order to continue their activities and sustainability in their competitive cycles. One of the problems of organizations and managers is the implementation of KM, considering the factors affecting the implementation of KM plays an important role in the success and development of the organization. Meanwhile, the factors affecting the implementation of KM, determining the importance of each of the factors and providing an appropriate framework for their application in KM implementation process play a fundamental role in advancing the organization's goals. The purpose of this research is to identify and rank the factors affecting the implementation of KM by reviewing the past studies. Methodology: Meta-synthesis attempts to integrate results from a number of different but inter-related qualitative studies. In order to identify the factors, all dimensions of KM implementation have been identified through Meta-synthesis using 335 papers were published in Sciencedirect, SID, Magiran and ElmNet from 2010 to 2018. Then, the importance and priority of each proposed dimension was determined using Shannon quantitative method based on content analysis. Findings: The results of the research in the extension method showed 3 categories (organizational, personal, and environmental), 8 concepts (KM process, organization structure, technology, management, individual, trust, competitive and culture) and 52 codes (knowledge creation (0. 016), knowledge identification (0. 026), knowledge leadership (0. 00), knowledge planning (0. 01), knowledge effectiveness (0. 024), knowledge sharing (0. 039), knowledge evaluation (0. 01), knowledge storage (0. 02), knowledge learning (0. 00), knowledge transparency (0. 00), knowledge implementation (0. 024), knowledge quality (0. 024), KM alignment (0. 02), organization strategy (0. 016), KM strategies (0. 039), employees enrichment (0. 01), organizational enrichment (0. 00), organizational sources (0. 02), financial sources (0. 016), organizational environment (0. 00), the number of employees (0. 016), recruitment (0. 00), organizational size (0. 016), performance evaluation (0. 026), KM system selecting (0. 026), employees training (0. 031), reverse engineering (0. 00), fast upgrade (0. 024), flexability (0. 032), confidence (0. 032), easy implementation (0. 026), technological tools(0. 01), storage capacity (0. 024), information technology infrastructure (0. 035), management support (0. 035), human resource management (0. 039), team working (0. 031), participation (0. 00), motivation (0. 034), justice (0. 00), readiness (0. 00), concentration (0. 00), communication (0. 031), employees trust and managers (0. 031), employees trust (0. 024), competition force (0. 016), benchmarking (0. 016), world services availability (0. 02), best practices (0. 01), knowledge base culture (0. 01), innovation culture (0. 032) and organizational culture (0. 044) in KM implementation. Conclusion: A successful KM program will consider more than just technology. An organization should also consider organization culture, leadership, strategic alignment, managers' support, information technology and motivation were identified as the most important factors for success of KM implementation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RONAGHI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, Zeinodinzadeh, Sara, & Alambeladi, Sepehr. (2019). Identification and Ranking the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management Implementation Using Metasynthesis Method. LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, 22(3 (87) ), 112-135. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/102712/en

Vancouver: Copy

RONAGHI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, Zeinodinzadeh Sara, Alambeladi Sepehr. Identification and Ranking the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management Implementation Using Metasynthesis Method. LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE[Internet]. 2019;22(3 (87) ):112-135. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/102712/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN RONAGHI, Sara Zeinodinzadeh, and Sepehr Alambeladi, “Identification and Ranking the Factors Affecting the Knowledge Management Implementation Using Metasynthesis Method,” LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE, vol. 22, no. 3 (87) , pp. 112–135, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/102712/en

Related Journal Papers