مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

60
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Methodological Pathology of Validating the Interpretive Hadiths of Imams (AS)

Pages

  37-82

Abstract

 The hadiths of Imams (AS) are the most important source for understanding the meaning and purpose of the verses of the Qur’, an. An important part of the hadiths is devoted to the inner expression and Interpretation of verses. Undoubtedly, accurate Validation of these hadiths is necessary to examine their attribution to the Imams (AS) and to explain the esoteric meaning and interpret the verses. Experts validate this reports in a variety of ways,Some have simply and optimistically criticized, selected and accepted them, while others, based on the phenomenon of forgery and exaggeration, have pessimistically criticized and rejected the interpretive (esoteric) hadiths. This study aims to answer the question of “, what matter in the field of critique method dose distort the realism of the evolutional result? ”,Assuming that the category of Validation or critique of interpretive hadiths is a kind of judgment that may be realistic and of scientific value or otherwise described, this article identifies the harms and expresses incorrect methods in evaluating these hadiths to prevent misjudgment of interpretive hadiths. Ignorance of defining exaggeration, failure to measure the data of rijā, l scholars, indifference to opposing sayings and reports, incomplete understanding of the text of the interpretive narrations, disregard of the rule of “, stopping and rejecting knowledge”,in the study of interpretive narrations, citing some principles of difference, supposing the Interpretation and commentary as similar, and relying only on “, theological-principle Interpretation, ”,are among the methodological defects of the Validation of interpretive hadiths that are explained in this article.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BABAYI, ALI AKBAR, Tayyeb Hosseini, Seyed Mahmood, SORKHEI, EHSAN, & Moraveji Tabasi, Mohammad Ali. (2022). Methodological Pathology of Validating the Interpretive Hadiths of Imams (AS). TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, 19(1 (53) ), 37-82. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1036566/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BABAYI ALI AKBAR, Tayyeb Hosseini Seyed Mahmood, SORKHEI EHSAN, Moraveji Tabasi Mohammad Ali. Methodological Pathology of Validating the Interpretive Hadiths of Imams (AS). TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH[Internet]. 2022;19(1 (53) ):37-82. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1036566/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI AKBAR BABAYI, Seyed Mahmood Tayyeb Hosseini, EHSAN SORKHEI, and Mohammad Ali Moraveji Tabasi, “Methodological Pathology of Validating the Interpretive Hadiths of Imams (AS),” TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, vol. 19, no. 1 (53) , pp. 37–82, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1036566/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button