مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

14
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

20
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review

Pages

  2159-2170

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

 Background: Economic evaluation is used for the optimal allocation of resources in the health sector. While a large number of economic evaluation studies have been conducted, there is less critical review of these studies. We critically examined the economic evaluation studies of preventive health interventions. Methods: The study was carried out using critical review method. Seven databases (i. e., PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Springer Link, and Elsevier) were searched to find articles on economic evaluation of health interventions published from 1985 to 2018. In addi-tion, the references of retrieved studies were hand screened for articles that were not indexed in these data-bases. Finally, 206 articles, including 33 cost-benefit analysis, 146 cost-effectiveness analysis, and 27 cost-utility analysis were included in this study. These studies were critically evaluated using a checklist of 11 crite-ria. Results: Only 20% of the studies met all the methodological criteria of health economic evaluation. The cost perspective, costs type, cost data source, and cost measurement were not explained and discussed in 17%, 20%, 5%, and 33% of studies respectively. Outcome data sources and outcome valuation method were only mentioned in 53% and 69% of studies. The sensitivity analysis and results’,generalizability were not reported in 16% and 46% of studies. Conclusion: The quality of economic evaluation studies is low, and it can be misleading if resource allocation decisions are made using this evidence. Authors should use valid protocols to conduct and report economic evaluation studies, and journals’,editors should use valid checklists to evaluate these articles.

Cites

References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOSADEGHRAD, ALI MOHAMMAD, JAAFARIPOOYAN, EBRAHIM, & Zamandi, Mahmoud. (2022). Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 51(10), 2159-2170. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1058715/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOSADEGHRAD ALI MOHAMMAD, JAAFARIPOOYAN EBRAHIM, Zamandi Mahmoud. Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH[Internet]. 2022;51(10):2159-2170. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1058715/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI MOHAMMAD MOSADEGHRAD, EBRAHIM JAAFARIPOOYAN, and Mahmoud Zamandi, “Economic Evaluation of Health Interventions: A Critical Review,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2159–2170, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1058715/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button