SURVEY OF QUALITY ERGONOMIC OF IRAN'S HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH THREE OTHER SOFTWARE FROM USERS' POINT OF VIEW

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAFDARI Z.; DARGAHI H.; SHAH MORADI L.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOSPITAL Year:2010 | Volume:9 | Issue:1-2 (34) Page(s): 33-42

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

924

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SURVEY OF QUALITY ERGONOMIC OF IRAN'S HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH THREE OTHER SOFTWARE FROM USERS' POINT OF VIEW

Author(s)

SAFDARI Z. | DARGAHI H. | SHAH MORADI L. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONQ2

HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMQ2

ERGONOMIC QUALITYQ3

SOFTWARE QUALITYQ3

STANDARDQ3

ISOMETRIC 9241Q3

Abstract

Introduction: EVALUATIONs of a system of information, without analyzing its users understand is impossible. User satisfaction is as key factor of success information system. It is essential to consider information system context (user, task, equipment and environment), user type and user experience in quality ergonomic computerized information systems. Therefore in this study HIS quality ergonomic of Iran compared with other software.Methods: A comparative study in 1389 was conducted. In order to compare the EVALUATION results of HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM with other software, applications were selected that already were evaluated using isometric questionnaire. These software are a) IS-H * med (software evaluated by Hamburg and colleagues in 2004), b) SAP-HR (software evaluated by Gruber 2000) and c) Microsoft word for Windows (software evaluated by Gediga and colleagues in 1999). Users view analyzed through descriptive statistical and one sample t-test. Data analyzed through SPSS and Excel.Results: HIS than IS-H * med of is significantly more usable. HIS than SAP-HR in terms of the IsoMetric Scales such as "suitable for task," "suitable for learning", "Error tolerance" and "learning ability" is significantly more usable. HIS vs. Microsoft's word is significantly less usable.Conclusion: The results of this study showed that HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM in Iran than the other software studied is average level in terms of ergonomic SOFTWARE QUALITY. It is recommended regarding user expectations when designing and developing of information systems.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAFDARI, Z., DARGAHI, H., & SHAH MORADI, L.. (2010). SURVEY OF QUALITY ERGONOMIC OF IRAN'S HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH THREE OTHER SOFTWARE FROM USERS' POINT OF VIEW. HOSPITAL, 9(1-2 (34)), 33-42. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106716/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAFDARI Z., DARGAHI H., SHAH MORADI L.. SURVEY OF QUALITY ERGONOMIC OF IRAN'S HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH THREE OTHER SOFTWARE FROM USERS' POINT OF VIEW. HOSPITAL[Internet]. 2010;9(1-2 (34)):33-42. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106716/en

IEEE: Copy

Z. SAFDARI, H. DARGAHI, and L. SHAH MORADI, “SURVEY OF QUALITY ERGONOMIC OF IRAN'S HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM AND COMPARISON WITH THREE OTHER SOFTWARE FROM USERS' POINT OF VIEW,” HOSPITAL, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (34), pp. 33–42, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106716/en

Related Journal Papers