DESIGNING AND DETERMINING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

VAZIRI N.; ARDALAN A.; RAHIMI FOROSHANI A.; AHMADNEZHAD E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOSPITAL Year:2015 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 (52) Page(s): 63-70

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

873

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

DESIGNING AND DETERMINING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE

Author(s)

VAZIRI N. | ARDALAN A. | RAHIMI FOROSHANI A. | AHMADNEZHAD E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTERSQ2

MIXED METHODSQ2

EXPLANATORY FACTOR ANALYSISQ2

Abstract

Background: EMERGENCY OPERATION CENTERS (EOC) have been established in recent years aimed to organize and coordinate through disasters. These centers are responsible for decision-making in response and recovery phases after events. This study is aimed to develop a standard function evaluation criteria for EOC.Materials and Methods: This mixed method study with sequential triangulation approach had been conducted in 1391 among employees of EOCs which have been running experience for minimum of one year. validity and reliability of questionnaire had been confirmed by face and content validity and Cronbach's alpha respectively. The most important factors have been determined by an EXPLANATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS which also helped reducing number of questions.Results: Final tool by six domains had 38 questions. All content validities were higher than +0.6 apart from one at +0.1. Only the activation domain had inappropriate Cronbach at 0.337 and all others were higher than 0.7. Factor analysis reduced number of questions in each domain. EXPLANATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS reduced number of questions from the views of information assessment, activation and coordination and other domains to 5, 2 and 1 respectively.Conclusion: It seems that mentioned questionnaire could be an appropriate criteria for assessing performance of EOCs due to its validity and reliability according. The high reliability was resulted from closed correlation of. Appropriate quantity of validity implied EOC personnel great depth of knowledge on all questions asked.

Cites

PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE PERSIAN VERSION OF READINESS FOR EVENTS WITH PSYCHOLOGICAL EMERGENCIES ASSESSMENT TOOL

References

Cite

APA: Copy

VAZIRI, N., ARDALAN, A., RAHIMI FOROSHANI, A., & AHMADNEZHAD, E.. (2015). DESIGNING AND DETERMINING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE. HOSPITAL, 14(1 (52)), 63-70. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106725/en

Vancouver: Copy

VAZIRI N., ARDALAN A., RAHIMI FOROSHANI A., AHMADNEZHAD E.. DESIGNING AND DETERMINING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE. HOSPITAL[Internet]. 2015;14(1 (52)):63-70. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106725/en

IEEE: Copy

N. VAZIRI, A. ARDALAN, A. RAHIMI FOROSHANI, and E. AHMADNEZHAD, “DESIGNING AND DETERMINING THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF QUESTIONNAIRE OF DISASTER MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE,” HOSPITAL, vol. 14, no. 1 (52), pp. 63–70, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106725/en

Related Journal Papers