A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOUGHT OF MIRZA MALKAM KHAN AND JALAL AL-E AHMAD; FROM MODERNISM TOWARD IRANIAN-ISLAMIC IDENTITY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FADAIE MEHRABANI MEHDI; MOEINI RAMIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Political Quarterly Year:2017 | Volume:47 | Issue:3 Page(s): 705-719

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,424

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOUGHT OF MIRZA MALKAM KHAN AND JALAL AL-E AHMAD; FROM MODERNISM TOWARD IRANIAN-ISLAMIC IDENTITY

Author(s)

FADAIE MEHRABANI MEHDI | MOEINI RAMIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

MIRZA MALKAM KHANQ2

JALAL AL-E AHMADQ1

UNDERDEVELOPMENTQ2

RULES OF PROGRESSQ2

NATIVISMQ2

Abstract

Underdevelopment is a phenomenon that has attracted the minds of many Iranian contemporary intellectuals. This study analyzes the causes of this phenomenon in thought of MIRZA MALKAM KHAN and JALAL AL-E AHMAD and ways to deal away with it. The essence of MIRZA MALKAM KHAN’s idea was struggle with UNDERDEVELOPMENT in light of progress and also “Jalal Al-e Ahmad” considered NATIVISM and a return to Islamic culture as a solution. The problem statements and the solution suggestions of those two thinkers can be explained within a theoretical framework “Thomas Springs”. The main research question is, why their responses to a same critical issue, UNDERDEVELOPMENT, are different. Hypothesis for the question is that due to political-social conditions and different subjective assumptions of Malkam and Al-e Ahmad, in crisis observation and discovery, each of them has envisaged a different ideal society and reached contradictory responses. At the end, the synchronic notion of both thinkers on the phenomenon of UNDERDEVELOPMENT has been emphasized and their ideas for change have been compared.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FADAIE MEHRABANI, MEHDI, & MOEINI, RAMIN. (2017). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOUGHT OF MIRZA MALKAM KHAN AND JALAL AL-E AHMAD; FROM MODERNISM TOWARD IRANIAN-ISLAMIC IDENTITY. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 47(3 ), 705-719. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/109980/en

Vancouver: Copy

FADAIE MEHRABANI MEHDI, MOEINI RAMIN. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOUGHT OF MIRZA MALKAM KHAN AND JALAL AL-E AHMAD; FROM MODERNISM TOWARD IRANIAN-ISLAMIC IDENTITY. POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2017;47(3 ):705-719. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/109980/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI FADAIE MEHRABANI, and RAMIN MOEINI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THOUGHT OF MIRZA MALKAM KHAN AND JALAL AL-E AHMAD; FROM MODERNISM TOWARD IRANIAN-ISLAMIC IDENTITY,” POLITICS QUARTERLY: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF LAW AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, vol. 47, no. 3 , pp. 705–719, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/109980/en

Related Journal Papers