مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

923
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CONVERSATION, FREE PLAY, AND STORY GENERATION AS METHODS OF LANGUAGE SAMPLE ELICITATION IN PERSIAN LANGUAGE CHILDREN

Pages

  51-68

Abstract

 The spontaneous LANGUAGE SAMPLE forms an important part of the language evaluation protocol. LANGUAGE SAMPLEs give us some useful information about how children interact with others, and evaluation of speech performed regarding continuous speech sample. The purpose of this study is to compare of linguistic structures of CONVERSATION (CV), FREE PLAY (FP), and STORY GENERATION(SG) as Methods of LANGUAGE SAMPLE Elicitation. 30 semnanian 5-year-old boys, who have a normal development in language and speech, were selected among active kinder garden through the town by cluster sampling method. Their LANGUAGE SAMPLEs elicited by these 3 LANGUAGE SAMPLE elicitation methods in 15 minutes. Linguistic structures of these LANGUAGE SAMPLEs, with use of 3 quality evaluation methods of speech including 1. number of utterances, 2. mean length of the utterance(MLU), and 3. lexical variety, are assessed. Means of these structures are analyzed by dependent ANOVA. The result show no significant difference regarding number of elicited utterances among these 3 LANGUAGE SAMPLE methods. STORY GENERATION, in comparison of FP and CV, elicits more MLU, and CONVERSATION, in comparison of FP and SG, elicits more lexical variety. Therefore we can conclude that in clinical evaluation, when there is more MLU, we have to use STORY GENERATION, and when there is more lexical variety, we have to use CONVERSATION method for elicitation.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AFKHAMI ARDEKANI, I., SHARIFI DARAMADI, P., & ALIJANI, F.. (2011). COMPARISON OF CONVERSATION, FREE PLAY, AND STORY GENERATION AS METHODS OF LANGUAGE SAMPLE ELICITATION IN PERSIAN LANGUAGE CHILDREN. QUARTERLY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 7(20), 51-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112177/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AFKHAMI ARDEKANI I., SHARIFI DARAMADI P., ALIJANI F.. COMPARISON OF CONVERSATION, FREE PLAY, AND STORY GENERATION AS METHODS OF LANGUAGE SAMPLE ELICITATION IN PERSIAN LANGUAGE CHILDREN. QUARTERLY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY[Internet]. 2011;7(20):51-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/112177/en

    IEEE: Copy

    I. AFKHAMI ARDEKANI, P. SHARIFI DARAMADI, and F. ALIJANI, “COMPARISON OF CONVERSATION, FREE PLAY, AND STORY GENERATION AS METHODS OF LANGUAGE SAMPLE ELICITATION IN PERSIAN LANGUAGE CHILDREN,” QUARTERLY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 7, no. 20, pp. 51–68, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/112177/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button