COMPARISON OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETIDINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ARIANA M.; RAFIEI M.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Surgery Year:2010 | Volume:17 | Issue:4 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

6,654

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETIDINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Author(s)

ARIANA M. | RAFIEI M.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMYQ4

BUPIVACAINEQ4

PERITONEALQ4

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: The use of different techniques that reduce post operative pain after laparoscopic surgeries, especially LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, as a one of the most prevalent laparoscopic surgeries, has been controversial. The aim of this project has been to compare the procedures of intraperitonal BUPIVACAINE and intravenous petidine as far as pain after LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY is concenrned. Materials & Methods: In a randomized controlled trial at Modarres hospital's general surgery ward, 48 patients, who had enrolled for LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY, were divided in two groups. In 24 patients traditional method of intravenous petidine, was used at the end of LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY surgery, for reducing of post operative surgery pain and in 24 another patients, intraperitoneal injection of BUPIVACAINE was used at the end of surgery. The two groups were compared as far as the need for excessive analgesic, respiratory effort and some complications such as nausea and vomiting, hypotention, and respiratory depression was concerned. The data were analyzed by SPSS 13 and statistical t-test, Fisher's exact test and multiple measure test, and were expressed as mean standard deviation P<0.05 was considered significant.Results: In none of the two groups, hypotetion or respiratory depressions were seen. The amount of need for oral excessive analgesic were significantly fewer in BUPIVACAINE group than the other group (P<0.05). Likewise, nausea and vomiting in primary hour’s after surgery were fewer in BUPIVACAINE group than pethidine group (P<0.05). Respiratory effort in BUPIVACAINE group was significantly higher than petidine group.Conclusions: The routine use of intraperitoneal BUPIVACAINE at the end of LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY is recommended, because it is more effective in reducing pain, nausea and vomiting and more comfortable respiration.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ARIANA, M., & RAFIEI, M.R.. (2010). COMPARISON OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETIDINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 17(4), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/112727/en

Vancouver: Copy

ARIANA M., RAFIEI M.R.. COMPARISON OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETIDINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY[Internet]. 2010;17(4):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/112727/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ARIANA, and M.R. RAFIEI, “COMPARISON OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE AND INTRAVENOUS PETIDINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 0–0, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/112727/en

Related Journal Papers