Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOSSEINI SEYED JAVAD; Firooz Mehboobe; Karimi Moonaghi Hossein

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Horizon of Medical Science Education Development Year:2023 | Volume:14 | Issue:2 Page(s): 92-100

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Applying Kirkpatrick's Evaluation Model in Iranian Nursing Studies: A Scoping Review

Author(s)

HOSSEINI SEYED JAVAD | Firooz Mehboobe | Karimi Moonaghi Hossein | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KirkpatrickQ4

NursingQ4

EvaluationQ4

ReviewQ4

ScopingQ4

Abstract

Introduction: Iranian Nursing researchers considered the Kirkpatrick model to evaluate educational programs. The present Review study was conducted to determine the possibility of a systematic Review and summarize the results on the Kirkpatrick model in Iranian Nursing studies. Materials & Methods: The present Scoping Review was conducted based on the Arksey & O'Malley framework. For this purpose, SID, Magiran, PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases, and Google Scholar search engine were searched with keywords "Kirkpatrick, ” "Nursing, ” and "Iran" and their Persian equivalents, without time limit. The final studies were selected based on the PRISMA framework. The information from included articles was extracted. In the last stage, the advice of four medical education and Nursing experts were applied. Results: Finally, 16 articles were included in this Review. A total of five and 11 studies had quasi-experimental and observational designs, respectively. The Kirkpatrick model’s initial two stages were applied in the six studies. In addition, other studies used four levels of the model to evaluate educational programs. A systematic Review study was not observed in the process of search. The six studies focused on the Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation courses. Conclusion: The current studies had weaknesses in using the Evaluation model, such as the incompleteness of the Evaluation steps. Future studies should focus on measuring all levels of the model. Further, the Evaluation of educational interventions on patients based on the Kirkpatrick model should be considered. According to the available evidence, conducting a systematic Review is impossible.

Cites

No record.

References