مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

16
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Promoting Ethics in Higher Education by Building Tools and Measuring Injustice in E-learning

Pages

  176-179

Abstract

 Background E-learning, despite its great development and benefits, has led to the digital divide and, consequently, educational Injustice. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to build tools and measure Injustice in e-learning. Method The research method is descriptive survey that the statistical population of the study includes all students of the electronic unit of Islamic Azad University and the sampling method is a class proportional to the volume that based on Cochran's formula 302 people were randomly selected for research. The research instrument is a researcher-made questionnaire on the dimensions and components of Injustice in e-learning, which has content validity and its validity coefficient based on Cronbach's alpha is 0. 94 and for data analysis from descriptive statistics (average) and inferential (factor analysis and t-test) were used. Results The research findings showed that the dimensions of Injustice measurement tools in e-learning include improper distribution of hardware facilities, improper distribution of software facilities, unequal abilities of students, poor implementation of laws and regulations related to scientific and research violations. The impossibility of proper implementation of e-learning programs in all courses and disciplines and the impossibility of proper electronic evaluation in all courses and disciplines, which explains 82% of the variance of the tool and the amount of Justice in e-learning in the study population (3. 57) is higher than the theoretical average (3). Conclusion Through the equitable distribution of hardware and software, enhancing students' abilities, adhering to scientific and research ethics, developing the ability to implement and evaluating curricula across all disciplines, we can help develop the ethics of higher education.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHAFIEPOUR MOTLAGH, F., ATASHAK, M., & ARBABI, Z.. (2022). Promoting Ethics in Higher Education by Building Tools and Measuring Injustice in E-learning. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 16(4 ), 176-179. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/1139219/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHAFIEPOUR MOTLAGH F., ATASHAK M., ARBABI Z.. Promoting Ethics in Higher Education by Building Tools and Measuring Injustice in E-learning. ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2022;16(4 ):176-179. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/1139219/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. SHAFIEPOUR MOTLAGH, M. ATASHAK, and Z. ARBABI, “Promoting Ethics in Higher Education by Building Tools and Measuring Injustice in E-learning,” ETHICS IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, vol. 16, no. 4 , pp. 176–179, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/1139219/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button