Neoliberalism and the Retraction of Welfare Law: A Theoretical Critique

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sahdan Fatimah; Gregorius Jelena

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES IN SOCIETY, LAW, AND POLITICS Year:2023 | Volume:2 | Issue:1 Page(s): 16-23

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Neoliberalism and the Retraction of Welfare Law: A Theoretical Critique

Author(s)

Sahdan Fatimah | Gregorius Jelena | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Neoliberalism

Welfare Law

Theoretical Critique

Policy Retraction

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive critical analysis of the relationship between neoliberalism and the retraction of welfare law. It investigates how neoliberal ideologies, characterized by market deregulation, privatization, and reduced state intervention, have reshaped welfare policies and impacted social equity and access to welfare services. Through an interdisciplinary approach, the article examines the theoretical underpinnings of neoliberalism, analyzes its socio-economic effects, and explores its legal implications for welfare provision. Case studies from the United Kingdom and Australia serve to illustrate the real-world impacts of neoliberal policies on welfare law. Furthermore, the article engages with counter perspectives, offering insights into theoretical and practical alternatives that challenge neoliberal approaches, such as social democracy, participatory democracy, and post-Keynesian economics. It proposes reforms aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of neoliberal policies, emphasizing the reinstatement of welfare as a universal right, adopting progressive taxation policies, promoting cooperative welfare models, and enhancing accountability in welfare service delivery. This critique contributes to the ongoing debates on the role of the state, market, and individual in securing social welfare, advocating for a paradigm shift towards more equitable, inclusive, and democratic welfare policies.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans