مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

472
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Analysis critical rationales believers theory repetition of revelation

Pages

  125-153

Keywords

traditions of the causes of revelation (asbāQ1
l)Q3
Meccan and Medinan (makkīQ1
)Q1
authenticity of the chain of transmitters (sanad)Q1

Abstract

 In exegetical and Qur’ anic studies sources, in order to determine “ the cause of revelation” or recognize a chapter or a verse as “ Meccan (makkī ) or Medinan (madanī )” , sometimes the criterion of “ repetition of revelation” is the main proof. Confronting with various and contradictory traditions, the supporters of this view bring up the theory of “ repetition of revelation” . This group of researchers has identified the authenticity of the chain of transmitters (sanad) and the type of a narrator's statement to determine the cause of the revelation (asbā b al-nuzū l); however, the limitation of the criterion of recognizing a verse or chapter as Meccan or Medinan to the authenticity of the chain of transmitters and the type of a narrator's interpretation, along with the primary presumption of the lack of ijtihā d of narrators, has created the emergence of different and contradictory narratives. Therefore, because of the inadvertence of the prevalence of such contradictory traditions, they carry them on “ repetition of revelation” and practically avoid the critique and denial of narratives. The reasons rendered by the advocates of this theory, scientifically, are not reliable; According to the principles of hadith studies, it is possible to prefer some traditions related to the sphere of revelation verses or chapters to others, while the opinions of the proponents of this theory are contradictory in justifying the alleged cases, and the failure to register the verses and chapters alleged in the official codex is another evidence for the inaccuracy of “ the repetition of revelation” theory.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Shekofteh, Roghayeh, & FEGHHIZADE, ABDOLHADI. (2018). Analysis critical rationales believers theory repetition of revelation. TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, 15(2 (38) ), 125-153. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/118573/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Shekofteh Roghayeh, FEGHHIZADE ABDOLHADI. Analysis critical rationales believers theory repetition of revelation. TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH[Internet]. 2018;15(2 (38) ):125-153. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/118573/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Roghayeh Shekofteh, and ABDOLHADI FEGHHIZADE, “Analysis critical rationales believers theory repetition of revelation,” TAHQIQAT-E ULUM-E QURAN WA HADITH, vol. 15, no. 2 (38) , pp. 125–153, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/118573/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button