COMPARISON OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR DIABETES PREDICTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAHANI M.; REZAENOOR J.; HADAVANDI E.; TAHSINI H.A.; SALEHI IRAJ

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Epidemiology Year:2015 | Volume:11 | Issue:2 Page(s): 46-53

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

769

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR DIABETES PREDICTION

Author(s)

Keywords

DIABETESQ2

NEURAL NETWORKQ1

GENETIC ALGORITHMQ2

LEVENBERG-MARQUARDTQ2

Abstract

Background & Objectives: In recent years, different decision support systems (DSS) have been used to predict and diagnose diseases. The purpose of this paper was to compare some DSSs and to evaluate their accuracy in predicting DIABETES.Methods: In this research, determination and optimization of the weights of the NEURAL NETWORK were undertaken using GENETIC ALGORITHM and LEVENBERG-MARQUARDT (GALM). Traditional and K-Fold Cross Validation were used to verify the models. Finally, the proposed model (i.e. GALM) was compared using logistic regression and GENETIC ALGORITHM based on area under curve (AUC), and Confusion Matrix.Results: After evaluating the results, the model based on the GALM algorithm showed better sensitivity and specificity in comparison with models based on the logistic regression (LR) and GENETIC ALGORITHM (GA). Furthermore, among other models, the proposed model had a high sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and a small negative likelihood.Conclusion: The results showed that the GALM model with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and AUC of 98.7, 90.01, 91.8, 98.3 and 0.979 respectively was an appropriate model for predicting DIABETES in comparison with models of GA and LR.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAHANI, M., REZAENOOR, J., HADAVANDI, E., TAHSINI, H.A., & SALEHI, IRAJ. (2015). COMPARISON OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR DIABETES PREDICTION. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 11(2), 46-53. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/120506/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAHANI M., REZAENOOR J., HADAVANDI E., TAHSINI H.A., SALEHI IRAJ. COMPARISON OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR DIABETES PREDICTION. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY[Internet]. 2015;11(2):46-53. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/120506/en

IEEE: Copy

M. JAHANI, J. REZAENOOR, E. HADAVANDI, H.A. TAHSINI, and IRAJ SALEHI, “COMPARISON OF DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS FOR DIABETES PREDICTION,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 46–53, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/120506/en

Related Journal Papers