THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH WEBSITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF HOSPITAL LIBRARIANS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHALAVAND HOSSEIN; ESKROOTCHI ROGHAYEH; ALIBEYK MOHAMMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health Information Management Year:2013 | Volume:9 | Issue:6 Page(s): 814-821

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,205

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH WEBSITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF HOSPITAL LIBRARIANS

Author(s)

GHALAVAND HOSSEIN | ESKROOTCHI ROGHAYEH | ALIBEYK MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INTERNETQ3

WEBSITESQ2

EVALUATIONQ2

LIBRARIANSQ3

HOSPITALSQ3

INFORMATION MANAGEMENTQ3

Abstract

Introduction: Many criteria are involved in the assessment of WEBSITES. The importance of these criteria differs depending on their various subject areas. The purpose of this study was to identify the importance of assessment criteria of health WEBSITES based on the opinions of hospital LIBRARIANS.Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in 2011. After face and content validity of the researcher constructed questionnaire (based on the likert scale) were evaluated, its reliability was determined by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.98). The questionnaire was distributed between all LIBRARIANS of 30 hospital libraries affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Shahid Beheshti University.53 questionnaires were collected. Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, and standard deviation) in SPSS for Windows (version 19).Results: Of the information quality criteria, accuracy had of the highest degree of importance (4.56), and price and response time had the lowest degree of importance (2.52). Moreover, in the external indicators group author credentials had the highest mean (4.73), and accessibility and advertising policy had the lowest mean of importance (2.20).Conclusion: Based on librarian’s opinions, the EVALUATION criteria of WEBSITES’ content information quality are of greater importance than their external indicators.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHALAVAND, HOSSEIN, ESKROOTCHI, ROGHAYEH, & ALIBEYK, MOHAMMADREZA. (2013). THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH WEBSITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF HOSPITAL LIBRARIANS. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 9(6), 814-821. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/122054/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHALAVAND HOSSEIN, ESKROOTCHI ROGHAYEH, ALIBEYK MOHAMMADREZA. THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH WEBSITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF HOSPITAL LIBRARIANS. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2013;9(6):814-821. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/122054/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN GHALAVAND, ROGHAYEH ESKROOTCHI, and MOHAMMADREZA ALIBEYK, “THE IMPORTANCE OF HEALTH WEBSITE ASSESSMENT CRITERIA BASED ON THE OPINIONS OF HOSPITAL LIBRARIANS,” HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 814–821, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/122054/en

Related Journal Papers