COMPARISON OF MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JAMALI HAMID R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Health Information Management Year:2013 | Volume:9 | Issue:5 Page(s): 757-767

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,261

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Author(s)

JAMALI HAMID R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATION STUDIESQ2

SCIENTOMETRICSQ2

IRANQ2

MEDICAL RESEARCHQ2

Abstract

The present review article aimed to identify, introduce and compare models and frameworks used for the impact assessment of MEDICAL RESEARCH. Comprehensive searches were conducted in various databases in order to identify models and frameworks. Those works that proposed a model or framework were chosen for the review and comparison. Thirteen different models and frameworks were identified. The level of assessment, items that models evaluate, and the type of impact they assess showed some differences. In terms of the type of impact, Research Excellence Framework was the only framework to cover all social, economic, cultural, and scientific aspects. There is still not a single standard model to assess the impact of MEDICAL RESEARCH. However, among the proposed models, the payback model appears to be more widely used and accepted. There is also ambiguity in the utilizations of the terms “impact” and “outcome” and in some works they have been used interchangeably.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JAMALI, HAMID R.. (2013). COMPARISON OF MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 9(5), 757-767. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/122149/en

Vancouver: Copy

JAMALI HAMID R.. COMPARISON OF MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT. HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2013;9(5):757-767. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/122149/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID R. JAMALI, “COMPARISON OF MODELS AND FRAMEWORKS OF MEDICAL RESEARCH IMPACT ASSESSMENT,” HEALTH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 757–767, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/122149/en

Related Journal Papers