COMPATATION STUDY OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE OPERATIONS IN ENDODONTICALY TREATED MAXILLARY PREMOLAR WITH MESIO-OCLIOSO- DISTAL CAVITY BEFORE AND AFTER MOUNTING IN AN ARTIFICIAL MOUTH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMIRI K.; ZAKAVI F.; OMIDIPOUR T.; JALALI Z.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jundishapur Scientific Medical Journal Year:2009 | Volume:8 | Issue:1 (60) Page(s): 18-23

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,504

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPATATION STUDY OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE OPERATIONS IN ENDODONTICALY TREATED MAXILLARY PREMOLAR WITH MESIO-OCLIOSO- DISTAL CAVITY BEFORE AND AFTER MOUNTING IN AN ARTIFICIAL MOUTH

Author(s)

AMIRI K. | ZAKAVI F. | OMIDIPOUR T. | JALALI Z. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FRACTURE RESISTANCEQ3

ENDODONTICALLY TREATED PREMOLARQ3

COMPOSITE RESTORATIONQ3

Abstract

Objective: There are many restorative designs for root canal treated maxillary premolars that each of which have their own advantages and disadvantages. One of this treatments is composite inlay restoration with fiber-reinforced composite which has sufficient retention, strength and acceptable apearence, as well as more compatibibility and less leakage than cast-metal restoration.Material sand Methods: In this - experimental study, after calculating a sample groups, 72 sound maxillary premolar teeth with the same size were chosen and fixed in acrylic resin so that the CEJ was 2 mm upper than the level of resin. The sample was randomly divided in to six groups of 12. Group 1 (positive control): intact teeth. Group 2 (negative control): root canal treated with MOD cavity preparation that had been extended 1 mm below CEJ. Group 3 and 4: root canal treated teeth with MOD cavity preparation for fiber- reinforced (Nulite F) composite inlay using Nulite F2 liner. Group 5 and 6: these groups were prepared in the same way as groups 3 and 4, differing in that, this specimens were restored by 3MP60 composite instead of Nulite F. Following restoration, all specimens was termocycled 500 times. Specimens of groups 1, 2, 3, 5 were loaded by the universal testing machine (Zwick z020, Germany) at speed of 0.5 mm/min. specimens in groups 4 & 6 onset were loaded by artificial mouth 1000,000 times then loaded by universal testing machine. Finally the results were analyzed using ANOVA test and comparasion multiple tests.Results: average FRACTURE RESISTANCE for first group was 2.091 killo nioton, (kn) second group was 0.862kn, third group was 1.577 kn, fourth group was 1.431 kn, fifth group was 1.296 kn and sixth group was 1.170 kn. According to data analysis the deference between first and second groups to other groups was significant. FRACTURE RESISTANCE of 3th group with 5 & 6 groups and 4 th group with 6 group have significant deference.Conclusion: because of increasing of the FRACTURE RESISTANCE in endodontically treated teeth that restorated with fiber-reinforced composite (Nulite F) and their significant deference in comparasion with conventional posteror composite (3MP60) as well as their other properties, can say that we can use fiber - reinforced composite as an acceptable method for reconstruction of endodotically treated maxillary pre molar.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMIRI, K., ZAKAVI, F., OMIDIPOUR, T., & JALALI, Z.. (2009). COMPATATION STUDY OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE OPERATIONS IN ENDODONTICALY TREATED MAXILLARY PREMOLAR WITH MESIO-OCLIOSO- DISTAL CAVITY BEFORE AND AFTER MOUNTING IN AN ARTIFICIAL MOUTH. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, 8(1 (60)), 18-23. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/12304/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMIRI K., ZAKAVI F., OMIDIPOUR T., JALALI Z.. COMPATATION STUDY OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE OPERATIONS IN ENDODONTICALY TREATED MAXILLARY PREMOLAR WITH MESIO-OCLIOSO- DISTAL CAVITY BEFORE AND AFTER MOUNTING IN AN ARTIFICIAL MOUTH. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2009;8(1 (60)):18-23. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/12304/en

IEEE: Copy

K. AMIRI, F. ZAKAVI, T. OMIDIPOUR, and Z. JALALI, “COMPATATION STUDY OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE OPERATIONS IN ENDODONTICALY TREATED MAXILLARY PREMOLAR WITH MESIO-OCLIOSO- DISTAL CAVITY BEFORE AND AFTER MOUNTING IN AN ARTIFICIAL MOUTH,” JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 8, no. 1 (60), pp. 18–23, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/12304/en

Related Journal Papers