PLURALITY OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS? COMPARING THE CLASSIC AND MODERN LOGICIANS' VIEWS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NABATI FERESHTEH

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Wisdom and Philosophy Year:2009 | Volume:4 | Issue:4 (16) Page(s): 101-113

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

1,375

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PLURALITY OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS? COMPARING THE CLASSIC AND MODERN LOGICIANS' VIEWS

Author(s)

NABATI FERESHTEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LOGICAL MONISMQ3

LOGICAL REALISMQ2

LOGICAL SECONDARY INTELLIGIBLEQ3

Abstract

Before emerging of the modern logic, the then current logical system seemed to be without any alternative. But now classical logic encounters several systems which claim to be logical systems and rival of classical logic. Therefore a philosophical question arises: Is pluralism in logical system and/or logical rules possible?Contemporary philosophers give various answers to this question. Many don't accept this possibility but their reasons are different. Past philosophers and logicians didn't answer explicitly to this question, but by using their work we can gather that if they had been asked about this question they would have given decisive negative answer to it. In this paper I try to show that they were realist about logic and consider logical truths and rules as "secondary intelligible" (in a broader sense of this term).

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

NABATI, FERESHTEH. (2009). PLURALITY OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS? COMPARING THE CLASSIC AND MODERN LOGICIANS' VIEWS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 4(4 (16)), 101-113. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123461/en

Vancouver: Copy

NABATI FERESHTEH. PLURALITY OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS? COMPARING THE CLASSIC AND MODERN LOGICIANS' VIEWS. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2009;4(4 (16)):101-113. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123461/en

IEEE: Copy

FERESHTEH NABATI, “PLURALITY OF LOGICAL SYSTEMS? COMPARING THE CLASSIC AND MODERN LOGICIANS' VIEWS,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 4, no. 4 (16), pp. 101–113, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123461/en

Related Journal Papers