مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,187
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AVICENNA AND AVERROES VIEW OF THE SOUL

Pages

  7-24

Abstract

 Evaluating and considering of IMMATERIALITY and immortality by three philosophers naming ARISTOTLE's (322-384 H.Q), AVICENNA (370-428 H.Q), and AVIROSS (520-595 H.Q) constituted the core of this article. Contradiction and ambiguities seen in some of ARISTOTLE's ideas is considered as the origin of the differences of his exponents about this matter. Philosophers such as Alexander Aphrodisias and (2 and 3 BC), AVIROSS attributed materiality and mortality of individuals’ souls and also AVICENNA attributed IMMATERIALITY and immortality to ARISTOTLE. Some definitions of ARISTOTLE on soul based on IMMATERIALITY and immortality as well as his emphasis on soul simplicity is an expression of accurate viewpoint of AVICENNA, not related to AVIROSS. AVICENNA relying on the lack of dividing the location of intelligible forms and also according to personal science of self-esteem proves personal souls IMMATERIALITY and survival of them. But, AVIROSS was not able to prove the personal souls IMMATERIALITY based on the unity of intellect course and the relation of potential intellect and active intellect and eventually, then did not consider them as immaterial and one.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABUALI, SAKINEH, & POURHASSAN, QASEM. (2015). REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AVICENNA AND AVERROES VIEW OF THE SOUL. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), 11(3 (43)), 7-24. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/123529/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABUALI SAKINEH, POURHASSAN QASEM. REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AVICENNA AND AVERROES VIEW OF THE SOUL. HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2015;11(3 (43)):7-24. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/123529/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SAKINEH ABUALI, and QASEM POURHASSAN, “REVIEW AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF AVICENNA AND AVERROES VIEW OF THE SOUL,” HEKMAT VA FALSAFEH (WISDOM AND PHILOSOPHY), vol. 11, no. 3 (43), pp. 7–24, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/123529/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button